Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
导演太沉迷于自己的暴力不美学了 剧情张力不够唉 仔细想想前作也是役所广司撑起来的 村上虹郎真可爱啊
这一集里没有孤狼，只有落水狗罢了。剧情还是比较冗长了，果然少了役所广司，恶警的感觉弱了，官僚体制下的警察果然是干不成任何事情的。铃木亮平把疯批极道演得很刑，无差别挖眼，冰锥插脑，激情断指，不守规矩的黑社会最终都是要吃枪子的。里面有斋藤工好评！
为什么?
好看是好看 还是喜欢看第一部 但是第二部日冈已经竭尽全力了 自己也能撑的起来了 反派也演的贼狠 够劲儿
视角混乱，一会儿是警察视角一会儿又是全知视角，人物塑造更是没头没尾，莫名其妙的文艺忧伤，最搞笑的是到最后我也没搞明白这个舞团是跳什么舞的，仓库里都是锣鼓这种民族舞装备，主角天天跳吉赛尔？看不懂
不如第一部，但铃木亮平演的出色。属于传统日式黑道电影，情节和节奏都太过老旧，太过啰嗦。故事上和最近的美剧《金斯顿市长》一样，行走在黑白两道，努力保持两道平衡，但终究也是被时代淘汰，或者成为棋子被抛弃。
起了一个片名是石黑一雄的小说，然后一味的往《杀人回忆》的风格上靠，弄得十分的文艺，絮絮叨叨两个小时，其实故事打磨得很粗燥，逻辑上的漏洞太大了，之所以给三星是因为它居然是网大，以网大来说有这种资质就算不错了。PS：三个女演员我感觉都一个模样。
非常喜欢这种带有时代特色、时代印记的罪案电影，那种九十年代甚至稍早的社会风貌，给人以真实感，风格也是趋于沉稳，不浮夸，倒叙的手法，总而言之，质量过关。
前半段还有第一部的质感，但是从日冈落马开始就没有那么精彩，剧情中局面的混乱并不应该造成调度的混乱。男角的表现都很拼命，七濑的表现就清汤寡水。最后追狼我很难理解，日冈最终的成长和顿悟又被玄学场景绕回了云雾之中，可能这也是降职后的空手道警探挥之不去的迷惘和执念吧？
只能说演员台词功底和演技都不行，台词也不行，大部分都是废话，片长可以缩短，没有必要这么长，拍摄风格就跟仿拍其他电影一样，剧情缺少内核，只是简单的故事发展，没有意思
美术摄影做的非常考究，故事也很有小说感，从画像师的角度来展开谜团其实是有噱头的，可怎么说呢，就是太流于表面，做的全部都是拿来主义，甚至调色人物设计也是按照杀人回忆的框架来的
服化道质感都在线，几个空镜很有感觉。探案中夹杂着一丝感性的思考，骨子里是个文艺片
大概会留下一些铃木亮平PTSD…上林这个角色的去人性化进程完成得差不多了，而日冈某种程度上也确实比第一部level up了。比起前作确实有气势上的差距，但日冈的处境某种程度上也有符合这种落差的悲凉感。以及，西野七濑另我出戏…
总是少了第一部分某一些独有的气质 同时置景和枪战 血腥已经沦为某种娱乐属性的意味了 警局内部的黑幕也是匆匆忙忙得赶制而写就的多余篇章 希望别搞个第三部出来了
蓝丝带bp怎么拿的？请问哪个地方可以赢驾驶我的车？？？
美术摄影做的非常考究，故事也很有小说感，从画像师的角度来展开谜团其实是有噱头的，可怎么说呢，就是太流于表面，做的全部都是拿来主义，甚至调色人物设计也是按照杀人回忆的框架来的
剧情还行，悬疑一般，感性过重，摄像好。。。
开始画面挺美的，要是调色更高级点就好了。不知道是摄影师的问题还是导演的问题，虽然镜头是精心设计的，不是瞎几把乱拍了，但还是略做作。不必要的景深镜头太多，并没有形成疏离感，还是不知道疏离感来自哪里，可能和剪辑也有关系，切来切去太快了，显得平庸，浪费了那些精心设计的镜头和调度。草丛里的惊悚氛围营造不太可，还不如《爱死机》第二季《高草地》，甚至和我第一个短片水平差不多，全靠音乐带。表演hin尴尬，看起来故事略《猎罪图鉴》。片名和海报以为是文艺片，其实并不是，看豆瓣介绍是悬疑，其实也不是，惊悚效果较之国内惊悚片还是质的飞跃了，我其实没敢看完，需要看两级纯喜剧压压惊😅虽然没看完但也不可能达到4星了，即便后面再不行我没敢看完，在国产惊悚片里面也可以打三星了吧，哈哈
比第一部好看很多 反派就是个疯批 动不动挖眼睛我人没了🙃 西野七濑的演技需要提升....
台词有点矫情啊，警察队长有点二哈啊，一个小县城的摄影师犯案之后还能平安无事那么多年？别为了悬疑而悬疑…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
