Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
对狙的过程拍的非常出色，前后两段有点刻意。结尾的上甘岭很不错，旁边的老两口这里看的最认真
最后连长点名那段哭死我了……
3、喜欢北野武，“虽然艰难，但我还是要过那种滚烫的人生！”“才有一次的人生，给我拿出干劲来啊你！”
我看的这场，有老人有孩子。一位戴着红围巾的老人也待到字幕放完，边下台阶边吸鼻子。
国师yyds，很多时候，我想要的只是讲好一个故事。
战争片多数视角宏大，这种以小见大的其实也很好
非常小的一个故事，场景也非常的少，人物也不多，但是一个完整的故事。狙击手好帅哦。
前半段面部表情太刻意看的有点出戏了，1小时后逐渐发力 认真自然(厕所那场戏那个侧脸 瞬间跳戏到无人知晓了) 师徒情的部分非常踏实。不知道是影帝表演的太柔还是剧本过于主打温情 ，想象里这该是个麻辣鲜师对付臭脸酷小子的故事 大泉洋演这类角色还是挺稳的
影片剧情，节奏，演技都不太行，2星，额外1星给抗美援朝伟大的先辈
中规中矩吧，没啥惊喜，除了柳乐优弥演得那一举一动实在太像了
不失煽情的喜剧人故事，有些想到《火花》里的师徒。
拯救大兵亮亮，失败。小孩那段有点意思，总体略显单薄了
一声“到”！太太破防了T_T
张艺谋导演拍摄的纪念抗美援朝的电影，整部电影几乎采用四川方言，很有熟悉的感觉，以小人物为出发点，以小见大，与传统的电影相区别，挺不错，很好看！
不错，虽然只是一场很小的战场，但总归是用视觉再现了故事，故事简单但很抓人，确实是短小精悍了
我妈妈走出影院后她和我说的第一句话就是“太棒了，真是挺长时间没有看到这么优秀的作品了！编剧编得太好了，你的导师真的太厉害了！”
有笑点，有泪点，实景拍摄，切入点小，没有一味地歌功颂德，90分钟体量，是近期难得看到的类型。没有抱有期待，没想到感动而归，老谋子还是老谋子！
这个电影虽然是从微观的角度看战争，但是也拍出了战争的残酷。片中许多血肉模糊的情节。侦察兵痛苦地从伤口中拿出情报，这一幕让人看了撕心裂肺的痛。这就是电影的力量，感谢这部电影，让我们更加珍惜现在的美好生活
3.5星进一位4星吧，这部电影实在太“分裂”了，总让人觉得张艺谋只干完了一半的活，剩下一半都交给外包或者随便什么人了，观影过程中总让人不断怀疑，能搞出这样的画面、台词的导演，是怎么能允许泛滥的子弹特效、emo过度上来就摁着观众哭的配乐存在的，甚至让人怀疑这是一部自媒体合拍片——张艺谋导演、b站选送up住进行剪辑和特效，公众号选送优秀kol修改和润色台词，不然没法解释这部片子离奇的身世
讲述北野武早期的经历，着重表现在法兰西座跟师父学艺，逐步成长，最后自己单飞全国出名，这种离别跟师徒间的情感，着实动人
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
