Synopsis
Do-seong (Yoo Min) is a child monk who lives at a small mountain temple with the head monk (Byeon Ki-jong), learning the teachings of Buddha. He becomes attached to a young widow (Choi Eun-hee) who comes to pray at the temple, and the childless widow entreats the head monk to let her raise Do-seong as her own son. Conflict ensues when Do-seong's real mother (Kim Seon-young) appears, but she leaves the temple for the sake of her son's future. On the day the widow is to take the child down from the mountain, the head monk discovers that Do-seong has killed a bird by ensnaringit in a trap and decides not to let the boy go into the secular world. When Do-seong finds out that his real mother has been to the temple, he sets out to find her.
Notes
"A film that has garnered recognition for its cinematography and direction by eliminating sentimentality and unaffectedly capturing the quiet life of a mountain temple. A Hometown in Heart demonstrates the camera technique and directorial skill of movies that appeared after the liberation of Korea."
A Hometown in Heart, adapted from playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung), was hailed upon its release as "a masterpiece that marked a new pinnacle in Korean moviemaking after the liberation." Eschewing new-school sentimentality to quietly express a boy's longing for maternal love, the film unfolds the everyday lives of three generationsthe head monk, a young monk, and a little child monkagainst the backdrop of a quiet temple in the mountains. The long shots utilized by director of cinematography Han Hyung-mo to capture the beautiful scenery of the mountain temple from a distance received great critical acclaim at the time. Also, each of the film's characters is convincingly portrayed through the skillful direction of Yoon Yong-kyu. In particular, the scene which expresses Do-seong's desperate yearning for a mother's love and his birth mother's past visit to the temple by combining them into a dream sequence reveals deep consideration for articulating story and emotion via a compressed visual grammar without tending toward sentimentalism. The movie's final scene, in which Do-seong awakens from his dream and sets off down the path in search of his mother, is both touching and beautiful. The film also features Choi Eun-hee, in the part of the young widow who warmly embraces Do-seong with her love, in one of her first roles.
Afterword:
- Lee Kang-su, writing under the pseudonym of Kwak Il-byeong, first adapted playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung) into a screenplay, which was then shot for the silver screen with additional embellishments by the director.
直接跳了将女孩杀害后的一部分，因为剧情显而易见，画面也有些不适，总体来说真的不算出彩吧。论交正确朋友的重要性
太惊险了，不过后半部分有些不现实的感觉。最一开始就不应该跟反社会人格出去攀岩，全搭进去了
什么破电影，精虫上脑引出一连串的脑残情节！！看了五分钟就没兴趣了！！！！
话说为什么逃不是走便于逃脱的路呢？
场面调度人物走位和间歇式配乐都很古典啊，整个风格看去有上世纪欧美黑色电影的味道。但浩大的声势背后竟然是如此的小打小闹，把政治拍成儿戏。或许从车子撞入墙壁的那一刻开始，就是一个美国形象的侵入，这些欧洲国家的政治和运动不过是一场游戏罢了。
cmbyn式夏日热恋，印度文艺风情，还可以
话说为什么逃不是走便于逃脱的路呢？
神秘租客串联了同性恋和异性恋，让哥哥和妹妹同时有了性启蒙。
当中国电影还小心翼翼地试探着什么题材能拍，什么题材是禁忌碰不得时，印度电影已经百花齐放了，尤其最近好几部LGBT题材，拍得又自然又商业，票房和口碑双丰收，不要歧视去看看，因为真的还不赖！看介绍是小说改编的，八九不离十是作者的亲身经历了，真想看看原版小说，因为说实话电影其实还差一点点🤏感觉。
初看片名以为是自然灾害之类，原来还有凶杀，不错
刚开始还以为男主是跟老师，没想到是跟房客，吻戏野战在43分钟，这剧拍得节奏很缓慢前面暧昧有一段时间我看得睡着了，之后剧情就非常厉害了，48分钟有一个撞桌捏橘子🍊的镜头好形象、1:06那半个苹果🍎也像溥仪被赶出紫禁城的那天，1:15老师一脸懵逼接盘还被一条咸鱼嫌弃，房客有句话说得好：我喜欢的东西很多，可一但得到了就都不喜欢了，好渣但真实，还擅长拐跑好人家的孩子，1:20分弟弟还梦到三人行
剧情和表演是典型的烂片 悬崖下的周旋还算凑合 我给两星 按通常多数人对于惊悚片的宽容度来说应该在五分以下吧 有些奇怪…
故事起首不俗，但發展下去後犯駁位不少，如女主熟悉地型又強於攀岩，卻不及壞人們為何能後發先至，及後也有不少情節不符合邏輯，而且女主角光環太強，少許離地，後期有點似科幻片。整體而言十分無聊時可以一看。
以为是极限攀岩类型片，其实是惊悚犯罪片，只不过把地点搬到了峭壁上，这点子不错，看着挺新鲜。影片10分钟进入正题，毫不墨迹，中途节奏稍有些拖，但成本太低也拍不出什么出挑的桥段，总体还好吧，算是安稳顺下来了，说不上哪好，但也没太大毛病，可以看。
错误的人错误的时间错误的地点，约翰大卫华盛顿的演技没得说，故事太老套，整体的逃杀也过于枯燥
生肉啃完，唯一能看的只有中间那段白天的攀爬戏，反派全程智商为负，明明可以慢慢耗却急不可耐接力作死，夜间特效太假，求婚那段没有感人只有搞笑
看了许多许多评论都没有提及该怎么应对反派，面对这种擅长柔道擒拿格斗 力量又超常人的反派绝大多数人都在逃避怎么应对这种人，绝大多数人碰到这种反派都是待宰的鸭子
Bug太多了，美国大使馆的防弹汽车没有安全气囊说出去谁信
还好最后的结局是发光发热
但是看完emmmm很怪，营造的夏天的氛围不是很浓，有点凛冽感。没有桃片贯穿的哲学思辨，仅有男主文学性的一些表达，有点表面。整个演员们的演技好端着，一板一眼的僵硬，没有很生活化，看着很出戏。男主老师的演技倒是很不错。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
