Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
你妈！这部比黑客帝国还让人失望！如果说王牌特工1够血腥，够有创意，第二部够热闹。这部就完全不像是一个导演拍出来的，，关于限制级的思考都消失。所有的动作都是平庸至极，所有作者性的恶趣味一概消失，况且也是一部R级电影，对应去年的黑客帝国，这两部就是绝对的一对。不想拍你妈就别拍，别在这作贱自己，恶心观众。去你妈的！
不能说藕断丝连，只能说毫不相关！什么玩意，和《王牌特工》屁联系？恶搞历史，然后儿戏情节，英国绅士独挽狂澜，最后神奇HE。浪费一众演员，费因斯真老了，年轻时俊美值其实远超儿子哈里斯·迪金森，以及英男的发际线。大BOSS太降智；那个保姆好讨厌，哪像个用人 。戏说列宁、攀登悬崖，真傻
Oxford父子上阵色诱Rasputin（这个名字也是妙） 然后一起爱的魔力转圈圈那把我笑惨了，更别说列宁看了大概要从坟里爬出来骂人。敢情这是个搞笑片。神奇的看到了戏份只有一丁点的古迪子，他怎么总是接这些奇奇怪怪的角色
狗屁不通大烂片 2022虽然只过去两个月 但是年度最恶心电影非你莫属 马修沃恩 息影吧 别折磨演员也别折磨观众了
莫名了个奇妙，大佬特工年衰体弱培养儿子成为精英二代继承衣钵，然后儿子就死了？？？合着这也是个工具人，老头子自己才是主角，这神马玩意儿？除了最后一战还有那么一咪咪可看，前面各种皇帝剧情简直稀碎，都不知道在作甚。
微微有点扯淡。拉斯普京勾起了奇怪的联想。
【4分】忘记骂这部了，马修沃恩你是不是有病。
挺认真的电影呀，怎么分这么低？反派有点蠢，polly很出彩
结局那只复仇的“山羊”
不是刁民流氓
哪怕是自己亲生儿子也无法阻止他以身试险。
过于黑色幽默/英国人大战红领巾/拉斯普京一打四/英国派谁吃了不想吐/fuck the gentleman shit/英国人被俄国人脱裤子 辱的难道不是英？
既不幽默也不讽刺还很绿茶，甚至连最基本的商业电影那种吸引观众不轻易走神都做不到，这到底是在拍什么东西啊。主角父子兵和荒谬反派团从头到尾干的关于“特工”的分内事加起来还不如女佣阵线联盟多，我只能说这个IP想要起死回生必须开启外传：王牌家政——
这个到底什么鬼畜！和第一部的距离差的太远了吧！
剧情实在是太弱了，而且架空历史都没架到点子上，看似玩得最凶的只能做彩蛋，这有啥意思啊？
很好看，怎么评分只有5.4分？？可能是前半段动作不够多，但是后面很精彩，特别是落在敌人总部的悬崖边上。推荐！
Mr no pants 为了艺术又把裤子脱了
这个系列你们不想要了可以卖给毕志飞哈，他还可以邀请郭敬明砍一刀
做了大量心理建设之后看的，觉得如果写成一篇脑洞向同人文可能反倒还不错？（当然前提是打上各种预警tag）但是拍成电影，理当有更高的艺术追求，比如不要给两位大帅哥剃光头！！以及不要给光秃秃的后脑勺拍特写！！
不至于5.3分吧！？我觉的很好呀，挺有戏剧冲突的，他儿子康纳被误当成德国间谍的时候，真的惊呆了，本来觉得他儿子会有更高成就的呢，就是前面陪着芭蕾音乐父子俩和妖僧大战时候有点扯，真正刺杀时刻那么情况紧急不会容人有一丝犹豫哒
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
