Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
我希望我更好地利用了我过去的时间。拍给孤独的人看的？看了让人有点伤感。三星半
画面氛围还不错，7分
故事，说它简单，关于信任及其传递；说它复杂，人类交给机器人了生命和希望，扮演完了进化历程中自己的角色，交接给新的物种。
这120分钟令我觉得我依旧是一个富有同情心追求真善美的好人，it makes me feel good。
“你去看世界了吗？” “…总是有各种各样的阻碍，健康、工作、妈妈、世界末日，还有…我只是一直没找到机会。”
一气呵成的美好夜晚，年轻的时候看这些会觉得人终究是要长大的，现在看只会觉得人终究是要变老的，于是更多一份不忍心，不想碌碌而为过一生，不想没有传承就消失，想要贡献很多，教会很多
—9.0分。
太温暖了，哭了，我是没想到一个末世片子能给我暖哭。那句“The three of us on the Golden Gate Bridge,like a painting that hasn’t been yet ”好美啊，这一刻的Jeff就像个吟游诗人，在末日里传唱着关于一个老头、一个AI和一条狗的故事
一人、一狗、两机，能拍出这么深刻的感情不易。
不是汤姆汉克斯资深粉的是不是看不下去？反正我是一度看得要睡过去了。节奏太慢，剧情简单，治愈温暖没有感受得到，只闻到了美帝国主义一贯的鸡汤味。杰夫是照着张国伟的形象设计的吧，明明系统都设置好了却总是各种好奇宝宝，犯错了被训的委屈巴巴的模样真的很茶，但也惹人怜爱，特别是代入了把抖音当朋友圈发的张国伟的形象后。
单调的浪漫，留一些惬意，存很多悲凉。即使是四个最可爱的个体携手并肩，也依旧难逃物质的消泯与抹杀。杜威的粉碎，是全片最无助的时刻。狗狗的依赖，又给人以丰沛的信心。人生来便是悬置在荆棘上的气球，飞得高，扎不破。
如果月球有一个公路片的版本 应该就是这个样子 真的好喜欢琼斯小哥啊
好温情啊，一人一狗一机器人。我想知道那个房子里的陷井指的是什么
设定上虽然有些矛盾存在，但是这不是科幻片，是在讨论一种可能性下的人性，看似简单的故事，内涵却极其丰富。人类在消亡，机器人还是个新生儿，结尾杰夫和狗的背影走过金门大桥，但是他们真的准备好了吗。
排球换成机器人了 汉克斯快去世的时候细节拍的太好了 很感人 这里的感情真的很细腻 又像朋友又像师徒又像父子
末世下的温暖小品，胜在小细节处的感动，整体背景经不起推敲。一般作品多把机器人作为人类的朋友或敌人来展开故事，鲜有令其成为人类继任者的案例，这部里的杰夫从初有意识惹出不少麻烦到成长为芬奇的得力帮手至把小狗托付给他，是一种拟人化的成长过程。影片基本是由汤姆·汉克斯饰演的芬奇的独角戏，汉克斯再一次塑造了一个坚强、温暖又失意的独立角色，看着他就能让人感觉到信心和力量，令人叹服。影片开头和结尾留白太多，既能让观众充满遐想，也会让人感觉没头没尾。
永远可以戳到我的点
披着“末日科幻片”的皮，《芬奇》的内核其实是关于亲情和信任的公路电影，让人一下子想到了《我是传奇》、《荒岛余生》等不少同类型的影片。
开头还挺末世朋克科幻的，越往后越冗长，不知所谓
汤姆汉克斯总能接到高质量剧本，这部片子估计能进今年奥斯卡吧，多个奖项都可以提名。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
