Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
感觉就像是主人的任务，为了把《玩具总动员》里巴斯光年的故事拍出来罢了，而这个故事却没什么新意。似乎看到了失去想象力的皮克斯的样子，为了机器猫猫加一星。
让人尴尬并昏昏欲睡的剧情，猫咪是唯一的亮点
还行吧，但是如果是挂着皮克斯的招牌那就还差的太多，但是还能要求什么呢，都已经物是人非了
星际穿越+星际旅客？有点强行主角光环，其实小分队里唯一有用的也只有那只猫，原来扎克爸爸是这么来的……
对于关键的科幻设定的随意处理还是比较容易被吐槽的，亲亲风波 没人提醒我还真没注意。如果是皮克斯的老观众，从玩具1的光滑平面，但现在宇宙星球和飞船复杂的材质表面，动画技术常看常新。跟toy内核已经完全脱离，最后，我们不过都还是猫的奴隶🐱
皮克斯什么时候也开始用让角色犯傻逼的方式来推动剧情了啊。。。本来也就是个普通的三段式结构，就算设计不出来出彩的剧本也不要这样摆烂吧.。。。
没什么惊喜，也算照常发挥。星战，星际穿越一等科幻电影几乎都能看到影子。LGBT线超有诚意。Chris Evans一配音，buzz的脸更加和美国队长无限重合，未必是好事。
抱着我的巴斯一起看，猫猫真的太可爱了，不能去电影院看真的可惜，To the infinity and beyond！
《我为什么不喜欢光年正传》
拍部衍生片还能拍得稀巴烂！！！
缺乏野心，只注重于自认为稳妥点一亩三分地，这大概就是我对本片的描述，从太空坠落的场景明明可以做得令人热血沸腾激动人心，然而最终呈现出来不过尔尔。
To Infinity And Beyond. 前三分之一还是好看的
如果是别人拍，是很精彩的，如果是皮克斯，也只是不错而已。不知道好莱坞有没有反应过来，梗太多会影响本身的故事。
电影告诉我们傻逼永远是傻逼。电影里面的那个逃兵就是大傻逼。
故事精彩、特效牛逼、动作场面超赞，比之前的玩具总动员好看10倍！当年的3D动画还是萌芽期，满满塑料感；现在的CG水平细腻真实，任何一个小细节都耐看。而且皮克斯从来善于煽情，好几段巴斯怀念故友的情节都被感动到了！整体有一种星战➕环太平洋➕火星救援混合体的观感，娱乐性十足。
“姥姥，我现在也像你一样成为太空骑警了”CE配音的《光年正传》算皮克斯中等水平太空冒险和found family 故事，开篇每次回来几年过去的蒙太奇又令人回忆起《飞屋环游记》的开篇时间催泪弹。有趣的是这部核心矛盾其实和《奥威尔号》306如出一辙都是重写时光但是给出了截然不同的方案，大家也可以看看那边～
我还挺喜欢这个开始的故事走向的,可是到了后面就变得太...迪士尼了.
这什么玩意儿…怪不得票房扑成这样，起承转合说是流水线套路都是高抬了，情绪太轻易角色转变也太轻易，怎么就因为留守的人的新生活matter放弃mission，初代滞留的队员难道想要这在异星流离一生的新生活吗？他们想回家的愿望就不matter了吗？反派身份更是让人莫名其妙完全没有前情设定，除了太空场景没有任何可看之处。从Luca到turning red再到这部，皮克斯这几年总能突破难看的底线是怎么回事
剧情推进得如此直白，缺乏想象力和深度，普通到不像皮克斯的作品，不明白为啥要给这部电影开绿灯，尤其是系列前作的精神仍存(玩具4都有点狗尾嫌疑），破坏了一些东西，又没有建立什么东西，像是一场硬上的戏，玩具粉看完除了惋惜就无话可说了。延伸到电影外，因同性情节就被声势浩大地抵制，根本没必要，“电影没那么可怕”，这句话放在世界上哪个国度都适用。
唯一讨喜的就是Sox猫猫真的好可爱🥺
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
