This early 70's giallo by Umberto Lenzi is certainly among the best in his filmography and also in the whole genre. Personally I think Lenzi's best films are the funny cartoon-turned-film Kriminal, the stylish giallo Seven Blood-Stained Orchids, the explosive Napoli violenta and this. In the eighties he did plenty of film trash in form of Eaten Alive, Hitcher in the Dark or Black Demons, all of which are ripping something off and/or very dull and slow moving. Knife of Ice came when the giallo boom was at its hottest and the result is convincing.
Technically the film is superb, containing great cinematography in the beginning when we learn about the main character's trauma towards trains. From this point on, Lenzi shows us his ability to benefit the widescreen and, for example, the bicycle ride near the forest is genuinely beautiful! This scene also shows Lenzi's ability to build suspense, very slowly but meaningfully. After all, there aren't so many murders in the whole film, only the suspense circulating around the murderer's identity.
One suspect is a devil worshipper which brings new aspects to the mystery. Since the final scene takes place in a church, one can wonder if Lenzi wanted to comment on something, maybe the hypocritical morale of church and superstition. The main character (Carrol Baker) is mute which demands a lot from her face and eyes. The actress works very well, giving us a believable performance circulating around the emotions of fear and mental pain. The other actors are good, too. The finally, however, may not give too positive a sight about female sex since they all are expressed rather negatively in the film, one way or another. Still this is easily among the most noteworthy in the genre, not as bloody as the Argento films, for example, but equally suspenseful and visually also interesting.
自由的代价到底是什么？要先看怎么去定义自由。自由永远是相对的，大家共同认可和服从一个规则，在这个规则的框架下，去获得最大的自由，而不是服从一个人。
刻意煽情，这种程度的所谓反抗是不能成事的。
能提供一些之前没有过的思考视角，比如我们谈起同性恋，是否也是仅将他们看作事不关己的“角色”？不愿接受身边人的不一样，是否是不肯接受世界的复杂性？他竖起墙不是保护自己，是为了让你们的世界看上去更简单。
曼德拉被放出来当了总统又怎么样呢？现在的南非不还是那个鬼样子 亲身接触过非洲黑人的才知道 这个人种不值得尊重和同情 就适合野生放逐
比较平淡吧，虽然影片寓意深刻，但是拍的较为平铺直叙，真正为自由而战，而且也没有伤害人质，只是烧了些货币而已。
还是太仁慈，杀几个人质也许还有机会逃出生天
和真实事件相差挺大的，加入太多刻意煽情的元素，呈现出来的观感并不令人满意。
有些自由不是born to have的 看完有点sad…
喜欢的点“有摩擦才会前进”“试着去了解和理解”，但还是理想化了。
豆瓣早已不是从前那个豆瓣了，连基本影评都要删，网无可恋！以前偶尔还买下豆瓣市集的东西支持一下，可如今的网络，如果一样东西没有什么特别的了，那它是可以被同样的东西所取代的。
对照网友提供的事件真相，这电影改编很大，与真相相去甚远。特别是杜撰三人组释放所有人质，彰显MK的正义，就属于编造的谎言了。
可以拍，别太假。温和的其实也是虚假的，代替了愤怒者去原谅，谁有这种资格呢？
为了自由，也是为了自己的信仰，付出了生命，电影里没有正邪之分，只有立场的不同
自由的代价是什么？Everything ! 三名南非战士行动失败被困银行，在明知没有退路之后提出释放曼德拉作为交换人质的条件，通过人质的众生相可以感受到那个时候南非种族隔离的严重性，黑人地位的低下，三位战士的牺牲最终促成了释放曼德拉运动。
男话说日本人同质化的角色怎么这么多，男主演过多少个这样温吞内敛好揉搓的角色了？虽然我真的很喜欢看小杏演少女，但是JK的角色也真的很多……
柔化的光线和取景进一步中和了内容的严肃性,增强了可看性。人物关系的叙述取舍得当，以简洁的方式将纯的众多关系网络完整化，为纯和三浦的主线发展留有了充足的叙事空间。基本上属于中规中矩的好。
南非的种族矛盾非常的激化，电影其实表现了部分白人开始有意识的想要缓解这种矛盾，说到底是因为压迫造成了这样的流血事件，就像当初的我们一样。人没有贵贱之分，无论肤色，民族，国籍，性别，老幼。
神尾枫珠还是跟女孩子更有cp感啊，虽然bl尺度还挺大的
好长气的对话，其实推进得好慢。但这三人的精神觉悟还是很高的，不伤害任何平民、警察，因为他们深知这么操作会变质，他们只是需要引起社会的足够重视就够了。任何一个运动或项目，要推翻或达成这件事，都不是那么容易的。电影把现实中的他们美化了，然后还牵起释放曼德拉的运动，是真的么？补补历史才行，否则就会出现英国绥靖导致二战参战国有时间备战这些错误的历史认识
多番博弈人心易，细察失言毙叛徒。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
