Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
相当不错，虽然谢苗一直在拍网络电影，但是大部分都很用心，个别电影还拍的还非常优秀。给我们说明一个道理：哪怕你没有最好的资源，也不妨碍你的认真和努力！
打斗场面好看，谢苗是吴京、安志杰之后比较好的打星了
看片名以为是个烂片，没想到非常接地气而且演员演技也不差，能看到是用心做的，虽然没有大的特效和大咖，但是我感觉真的不错！给五星鼓励！
现在看不了没内涵的片子，真的只有有难度的东西才有意思，只有烧脑的东西才有意思
网大水平，逻辑感人。哥仨都干到沃顿商学院了，还这犯罪逻辑？
影评：看之前其实没抱多大的希望，看了以后发现整体还是不错的，剧情虽然很一般，但是打斗戏确实很过瘾，谢苗的演技确实不错的。
整体来说真的挺不错的，很精彩。但是我感觉有点个人英雄主义了，没有团队配合。其它警察都是打扫战场的吗？
四星，鼓励一下。谢苗要再次火起来，毕竟还是有实力的。顶级网大，拳拳到肉，感觉走甄子丹杀破狼和导火线的动作风格。只是剧情和画面差点。而且色调太暗。
东北不是这样婶儿的！东北不是这样婶儿的！再重申一遍！东北不是这样婶儿的！
谢苗从小看到大…… 这次特别接地气。片子除了对赌局抵押资产描述有点蒙逼之外，其它都很不错，几位演员演技在线，比一些大制作不知所云的片子好上太多。
谢先生，你今年38了。你的演技追上你的年龄
精彩，网络大电影的质量越来越高了，短小精悍，不拖泥带水。
打得干脆利落颇有新意，给六分的是有啥成见么
谢苗可以的，文戏武戏都能带观众入戏，真的超其他演员一截，每次看其他演员表演略感出戏的时候，都被他拉回来。
今天看的第三部电影，属实看笑了。纯纯为了打架而打架。不过打得不错。
整体来说真的挺不错的，很精彩。但是我感觉有点个人英雄主义了，没有团队配合。其它警察都是打扫战场的吗？
原来是谢苗主演，之前没注意，故事一般，打斗不错。
谢苗，儿时看过的童星，不应该这么埋没了。武指和导演挺好的，武打场面很逼真，不过少数镜头差点力道。事件紧贴时代，所以剧本结构简单，但选材可以，不错。因为片长一个半小时，节奏快，不啰嗦，看的舒服。整片三星半太少，四星又有点过，但是根据实际情况，好片子需要好的制作环境和条件，已经很不错了。希望会有更好的作品出来。另外，说句招黑的话，单从拍摄角度和动作的逼真程度，个人感觉不比战狼差，甚至略胜一筹，当然我只是门外汉，只是一个观众，只拿一对一的场面来比较，战狼有夸张且有蜻蜓点水的嫌疑。那种虚幻的疼痛感，我在本片能感受到，5星鼓励
后面肖家三兄弟的现在 show time 剧情奇奇怪怪，美式坏蛋大战超人里的剧情特摄。
剧本真是渣，虎头蛇尾，但是打斗还比较棒，线下小众电影均分这个数已经不错了，选角还都挺好的起码不出戏
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
