Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
整部电影为了宣扬宗教而不惜放弃了剧情的逻辑和人设的合理性，看的时候影院里的其他美国人在看到女主自己一次一次跑回去的时候都笑了。
整部电影为了宣扬宗教而不惜放弃了剧情的逻辑和人设的合理性，看的时候影院里的其他美国人在看到女主自己一次一次跑回去的时候都笑了。
Never look back, Never look forward.
fiction is the new reality
和不要抬头对照来看，这部已经是直接骂街了。
还行，很多事都感觉挺遥远，不像2021发生的事。
宗教色彩很浓 像是要传教 女主的自我蜕变还是蛮励志的 长得也好好看
关键词：大选闹剧 气候恶化 奥运会的举办 电影业的复苏 亿万富翁的宇宙梦 塔利班再度掌权 如火如荼的woke文化 堕胎权开倒车 脸书的当机 丑闻与扎克伯格元宇宙 当然还有贯穿始终的 疫苗 疫苗 疫苗 (1. 用薯条汉堡和甜甜圈诱惑大家来打针 想不出比这更美利坚的事 2.AUKUS要是加上法国就会变成FUCKUS笑死 3.网飞明目张胆夹带私货裹了布里奇顿 渔业阴谋 鱿鱼游戏三部自制作品 4.深切缅怀事业死亡环节没有Shia LaBeouf, 曼森和DaBaby也就算了 连节目停播的Ellen都漏掉不应该)
四平八稳的平庸就是这样，没什么特别不好，却也没任何让人激灵的东西。因是新片误入，浪费时间。#《谁可以这样爱我》#，片名还如此肉麻。
我在今年有什么收获？收获是2020年大家什么都没有学到
是最渴望突破的自己
如果说2021学到了什么的话，就是没人从2020年学到什么。周而复始，看来要成为每年的定番了。
我建议每一位打算投身欢场的女性，都应该在下海之前，去观看这部电影😬
让人期待的Death to 202X 又来了！每年元旦前定期观看都有种看元旦联欢晚会的感觉了。6
以为拯救女孩的是男人，原来是上帝……可怜的姑娘，命运悲惨，最终能获得幸福，还是蛮感人的。
大体还是延续了上一部的风格和主要演员，2021年的故事更多，这些角色依然还是那么愚蠢和可笑，我最喜欢英国的那个傻妞。为什么片中没有提及美国的反亚裔问题？刘玉玲白出演了
最后：爱是存在的，存在周围，因为，我们专注在那些死而带不走的东西而无法感知到。
是无条件的爱拯救了她 给了她勇气和力量 爱是无论你经历过什么 无论你是什么样 都会永远爱你 / 上帝会听见你的声音 如果你相信 如果你愿意自救 / 女主鼓起勇气说出真相救了两小女孩时真的太感人了（有几个世人可以拥有如此坚定 永不消失的爱）
合格的传道布教片，双主颜值在线（女主太作），看完内心毫无波澜怎么回事。
认识了福音电影这个Genre 刷新了三观 豆瓣为什么不能打负分😅
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
