A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
挺好玩的。
最后她选择在剧中装傻，但现实中还是骗不了自己。
狡猾地把技术革新还有后疫情时代下的闭隔感包装于类型故事里，近身动作、POV、独行侠设定的女性驱动动作片；样样都有，也可看作是对《极寒之城》、《节奏组》等一系列成功或者不成功的同类作品更现代、更具时代意识的补充。但花招大于内容本身，角色动机与任务意义语焉不详；Zoë Kravitz把更多的精力，投入到了表情或者某个镜头的塑造中，即使流畅精简的时长，也依然不免冗余。唯一的区别在于，这是一部服务于流媒体、创作者力求速战速决的小作文，也就尽到它被赋予的使命了。
原来不只是我一个人觉得混乱，后半段才看进去，可能是字幕翻译问题，词听不全，过段时间再看看英文版。只能说的一点是起码人物塑造很好，很形象很立体很丰满，真的印象里第一次看Kidman，此片表演很好。对于我，不是本身很有魅力的演员，但此戏确实撑的起来。
对不知道本事件的观众极不友好，上来人物背景都不介绍，直接大段台词，节奏极快，只能弃剧！
剧情不算复杂，还是挺有现实感、科技感的，索德伯格的手法和感觉还行，只是最后女主拿射钉枪解决几个家伙的过程简单了点，欠点说服力。另外，多好的智能设备也怕断电，那些人居然这点常识也没有吗？
妮可基德曼不适合当露西鲍尔
看得很过瘾。而且这种90分钟的电影已经很少了，所以很珍惜。
3分。挺工整的真人改编电影，妮可·基德曼的表演挺出彩的，但是导演还是有点野心过大了，妄想在短短两个小时里塞下年轻时候的故事，戏外和戏里面的故事，看下来实在是有点割裂感，从周一到周五的流水账日记式剧情，也感受不到一个整体的连贯性，这种叙事方式实在不投巧。
22/2/12：不看简介到20分钟就明白了这是一次致敬安东尼奥尼放大的新作。简介是为了防和谐胡诌的嘛
三星电影+一星粉丝滤镜 虽然毒妮额头平整到可以反光 还是希望我大毒妮能够拿到女主提名 因为除了脸不能动 演技还是到位的😂
4. 社恐
其实就剧本层面并不觉得索金拉了。可能相比非常有话题性的大审判，一个情景喜剧女演员如何面对白色恐怖和家庭情感并不让人感兴趣
一句"Lucy,I'm home"不再是幽默开场
开始20min分钟剪的很乱，看了差不多40min接受了电影的节奏。妮可演的很棒，迟早二封。剪辑很差，中间的tv部分不知道是哪个时间段插进来的。剧本的对话安排的有点凌乱，不给人梳理前后矛盾的空隙。
妮可的表演确实很撑场面，在提名的五部中应该值得一座小金人。就是脸整的都快认不出了… 哈维尔.巴登好man啊～ 就是整部电影剪的细碎，剧情不太有意思…
近几年老这么拍传记片 且抓住一个小细节小情绪抠啊抠 再也找不回当年看朗读者和changeling 的感动了 谁来结束这个时代/前半段实在是昏昏欲睡 后半段突然明朗起来 挣扎与桎梏也有了理由 仿佛看见“演员的诞生”里固执的章子怡 又好像看见“浮生路”里几近偏执的肥温 ；中途一度不清楚只因为妆还是打针的原因 妮可的脸僵得不行 去看了原主人公的照片只得噗嗤一笑 豁然开朗 ；成片质量一般 但看完全片一扫疑惑与冗长 是完全值得二封的表演。
没看懂，中间瞌睡虫和进度条争相领先。
挺好的 比dont look up好点 跟其他的又不是很能比 没明白后来怎么还是离婚了 也不太想深究了
昨晚看的，现在依然沉浸在后半段的悲伤情绪里出不来。我觉得妮可好的地方在于，她演的是一个真正的女人，锁金写剧本先把她当做一个女人再去填充其他符号，但是电影前半段确实拖沓没重点，虽然我觉得这是今年好莱坞少有的真正写女人的电影。Kidman除了长得不像，口音学的不错诶，而且声音本来就像，真正情景剧的场景不多，所以还好。如果Debra Messing来演肯定演不了这么好，毕竟她只是喜剧演员
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
