Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
鬼节项目，水怪质量差了点，皮套不够精致哈哈哈，故事还可以的，稍微有点尴尬
还行 有点恐怖童话的感觉。不知道为啥女巫那么好看。
PG评级的儿童向恐怖片这视觉尺度也算不错了，概念也算清晰，最大亮点是Krysten Ritter的表演，就是故事上没有提供任何真正的惊喜。
故事编的在网大中真的还可以啦，看到最后竟然有被感动到！弟弟还真中国版《水形物语》了😂
很不错啊 制作很用心 鬼故事 女巫 女巫城堡制作都很不错 结尾还有悬念 挺好的
Of course, it’s another queer-baiting movie🙂！故事叙述急促混乱，节奏把控非常稚嫩。但是画面，布景，和配色真的很美很舒适。最喜欢的场景是The Jungle
一开始的时候觉着网络电影的海报仿用了《水形物语》的色调。没太感兴趣，朋友推荐看过以后感觉真不错~90年代老旧电影的胶片风格，剧情人物都皆有可观之处，可惜收尾剧情还是略有些免不了俗~国产K怖片里算是比较难得~
两星一星给Kristen和小男主，一星给布景设计。
怎么觉得就是一部大乱炖，哈尔的移动城堡，糖果屋，外加故事中的故事，只是小演员的文笔演技在线，其他确实get不到点。
拍摄、色调还不错，但是故事确实没什么新意，女主好看但是演技着实拉胯
年轻女巫居然是Krysten大美女！😵💫口黑加蓝发真的都认不出了！可爱儿童故事。小猫好可爱。
内容上基本符合预期：撕逼、舞蹈、床戏、青春的肉体、华丽的舞台布景，讲故事的技法毫无亮点，瑕疵不少，结尾突兀，还有就是舞蹈场面的展现很差。
各种标签…以及太冗长了…唯一高光部分是开着悍马在抄近路追逐那一段…
本以为是一部小成本喜剧片，没料到是一部大制作，场面够大，里面还有致敬马里奥赛车的桥段，包括扔香蕉🍌
披着恐怖皮的温情片，加入了一些黑暗童话元素（糖果屋ptsd了）
2星，低龄低幼的儿童片，哈哈。整体还行。小孩子看看不错。
听故事的人变成了讲故事的人，讲故事的人变成了故事里的人
之前被评分忽悠了，其实影片不错，剧情流畅没有尿点。在奇幻片里还能做到逻辑自洽就是好故事。小男孩演得超赞！书呆子气息不好把控，过了少了都尴尬，但是温斯洛棒棒哒。小女孩的角色略多余。当然果然我还是冲着美美哒丽特来的！
从第一部就觉得挺捧。 没想到第二部也很不错哦。 真的精彩 ，越到后面越紧越入戏。看着看着全家都看起来了😄。 大女主是真勇为敢为。演技炸裂。
额～～其实也不是很恐怖，剧情看到一半就能想到结局了，国产恐怖片也就这样吧，主线就是个基因突变和寻亲记
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
