Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
编造
一些呼应的段落，第一次出现送妹妹去上学的时候，妹妹和孙爷爷打了招呼，因为这种长久的日常问候，后来哥哥来迟了，爷爷才会收她在保卫室里，有点想到 在第一幕出现的枪，第三幕一定会响 。
6/10。有佳句无佳章，互换抽烟的暧昧与角力像《卧虎藏龙》里的竹林打戏。男主的死象征着蛮荒时代的终结，最后他穿着代表现代文明的西装进了棺材。血性西部背景下的东方隐忍，是好角度但并不新鲜，这可能是文化差异造成的。“答非所问已经是答了”，它依旧给了太多，像一道数学题而不像诗。（小男主前途无量啊，他与卷福的比拼才是场犬之力）
没人能抵御这种底层小人物的温热，虽然对套路化的情节设计做到了比较完整舒适的呈现，但依然没有逃脱刻意煽情，取悦于初级观众的弊端。日韩的同类型电影，已经可以将情感融化在最日常表达中，而非单独拎一块出来彰显情感，这也是目前这类华语电影面临最重要也最需要解决的问题
就是心疼到不忍心减星的那种，一个小孩拼成这样照顾家人书都念不上～电影的节奏还不错，全员好人也不讨厌，只是现实中，人们总能一起熬过困苦的日子却不能知足地共享富裕。时势，英雄，拼搏千千万，电影涂抹了一个最理想的缩影
又扫一次辛酸
好好的现实主义题材电影，为什么胡乱添加浪漫主义和成功学呢？
文导，每年贡献一部这样的电影不过分吧？虽然故事是很普通，但电影节奏把握得很好啊，演员演得也特别棒！
纵然前半段现实，后半段理想，但小人物的奋斗光芒永远最光彩夺目
前面真的挺棒的
就像一篇优秀的套作
想在北上广感受温暖，去晒太阳吧，这样得实际一些
有点中国版斯皮尔伯格的味道，内容不错，商业包装也好，外加一点镜头语言。卖相就看起来很不错了。
电影讲述了一个小人物逆袭的故事，易烊千玺演技真的是越来越厉害了！
又赚我眼泪。。。虽然剧情都可以预料，但是小朋友演得真不错~前半段看的我着急，真想爬进电影里面去帮帮他
现实中小人物的艰难困苦远比电影更苦更难，然而这千千万万的蚂蚁中又有几人能得到电影结局般的happy ending呢？生为为人本就不易。。。希望一切终有圆满吧！
深圳没有人文 没有沉淀 只有一千百万种实现梦想的可能性。
真敢拍
导演对节奏的掌控能力依旧不俗，但是故事本身的冲突实在很单一，跟前作中那些复杂的伦理困境无法相比。
他把他杀了，他被他杀了....可怕
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
