Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
简而言之吧 郑渊洁的皮皮鲁是大人也可以看的 这个电影并不是 只是个情怀罢了 可惜了
本来只是为情怀买单，结果被小演员们的演技和改编故事的完成度惊喜到！bug肯定有，结尾略草率，给小朋友的话够看啦。
这个皮皮鲁选的有点问题，比较适合动画片，不太适合真人版
童年喜欢的书搬上屏幕就热血沸腾了。剧情不错，特效有待加强。结局略狗血
陪孩子们看，小学一年级能看懂了。在如今双减背景下，这片子很有意义了。郑渊洁爷爷超前了30年，厉害极了。
小时候看过郑渊洁的十二生肖童话故事系列中的若干部，虽未曾等到所看书籍的影版，但也惊喜的遇到了电影《皮皮鲁与鲁鲁西之罐头小人》。影片的整体水平中等居上，聚焦于小孩的群戏，让已不再年轻的大人们，得以顾盼到往昔的岁月，与逝去的童年惊喜重逢。
国庆一家人一起看，讲述皮皮鲁和鲁鲁西西跟五个罐头小人的友情，互助故事，情节的学校考试，老师，家长对孩子要求，像极了现实，不过还好有最后好学生的定义，有爱，有勇敢，有努力的学生，女儿看着搞笑又紧张。
陪孩子看的，虽然是我的童年，但是20多年后依然在教育我，当好一个家长，并不容易。
一星给郑渊洁，一星给配乐（魔方大厦的音乐）。
之前一直在怀疑现在还有没有儿童电影，现在看来还是有的，就是太少了。
一家三口看。焦哥觉得很老派，芬达看得很投入，但也很冷静，我被打老鼠弄感动了。厅内有个小男孩嚎啕大哭。
小学可以开除学生吗，小学还有什么保送重点中学？九年制义务教育不都是按学区来的吗？小孩让五个小人先回家，他们怎么回去？回去得多久？能活着到家吗？为了推进剧情最后还来个学校火灾也太狗血了吧。不过我那个上三年级的儿子很喜欢看。
我真的想不通为什么要花这么多时间去描写“作弊”和“偷”？鲁西西和罐头小人决定用“偷”的方式帮助同班同学来获得颜料，听到这个字儿的时候，我真的眉头一皱，下意识看了一眼隔壁坐着的我10后的娃，你这是教孩子什么呢？其实也很简单啊，你别说“偷”不就得了，就算你去老师那儿了，你“借”来用用用完还回去总可以吧？原著里是没有这段情节的，也不知道改编来为了表现什么，还不如把时间匀给原著的上尉救福尔摩斯描述的更加精彩，至少能表现罐头小人们的智力水平吧， 而电影里这段“偷颜料”，小人躲在红色绿色暖水壶后面押宝班主任会拿起哪个瓶子？所谓的制造紧张，就跟警匪片里拆弹一样，我只能说噢好吧，主角光环运气真好。
笑声和眼泪齐飞，暗黑共“正能量”一色。
3、片尾很好地向小朋友介绍了特效场景是如何拍摄，以及拍摄中的酸甜苦辣；
制作很一般，表演也过于用力，大人里就王启年还算自然，小孩里那个粉发卡行使程序正义时瞟过一眼，非常有马尔福的神韵。剧情基本保留了，刻意营造了八十年代气氛，特效也像八十年代的。五个小人的造型用的第一版鲁西西那本书里插画的设计，有点怀念。
故事完整流畅还很好看，还很动人。
前半部分是郑渊洁的那个故事 后半部分不是 虽然挺好 但是难免违背了原来的故事的初心 甚至说完全是两个故事
另外这部剧第一标签居然是喜剧真是搞不懂，从头到尾我只在阴暗中感到悲哀。
前半部分是郑渊洁的那个故事 后半部分不是 虽然挺好 但是难免违背了原来的故事的初心 甚至说完全是两个故事
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
