A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
所以，我也想对任何一个有可能会看到这条评论的人说：
失望，一部自嗨式的庸俗套路。粗制滥造到这个地步，还想说自己没有过气。
是枝裕和继续组建非亲缘家庭，在韩国语境下倒没有水土不服的症状，小段落依然可见编剧功力，演员的演绎也颇为可信，但整个文本却是完完全全的空中楼阁，成员的汇聚和共情也根本缺乏足够的动机。善良是一种美好的特质，但不带锋芒的善良只能导向虚假——很难想象在这样焦灼的情境中，众人还可以把逃跑变成一场旅行。不知道是枝监督是不是感觉在国内的创作到了顶点，才选择不断和异国文化进行碰撞，而戛纳选这部片子来褒奖宋康昊的演技，更像是给这位韩国在世最伟大的男演员一个生涯肯定。
好了，还完债，就好好拍戏吧，尼古拉斯凯奇！
宋康昊慈母般的憨笑，把裴斗娜都感化了。这趟孩子转运之旅，犹如细水长流，点点滴滴都是爱。是枝裕和，啥时候也能来中国拍一部呀?
剧本细节亮点依旧很足，至少看完后有不少场面留下深刻印象，比如摩天轮上流泪遮眼，太巧妙了，既暖心化解人物情绪，也是对演技的抬升，动车进隧道那段也是，是枝裕和对演员也太温柔了吧，技法都用来保护演员了。
凯奇自己拍的很高兴，观众笑他很傻逼，这就够了，还要啥呢？（对了，债也还完了）
这样的组合，这样的成效，确实给人草台班子的感觉。
看完这部电影我难受了许久，不是因为宋康昊竟然凭这样的表演拿下了影帝，也不是因为用韩语来呈现是枝母题所扑面而来的尴尬，而是因为我发现我再也欣赏不了它了，那种纯粹且一厢情愿追求美的善。
伏笔、线索的处理也极端简单。
戛纳评委太惨了，看了话痨片《未来罪行》又要看大闷片《掮客》。一部去精华版《小偷家族》，一个毫无意义的无聊剧本。表演也没有亮点，所有人都是一副苦瓜脸，姜栋元和IU如同两块木头，宋康昊稍好一点，戛纳影帝没问题，但不该凭这部片子拿。
一直以为是凯奇准备拍个文艺片来解构自己，有点像灾难艺术家那样，没想到最后还是变成好莱坞之前最擅长的荒诞喜剧了，但还是情怀满满，有趣的地方是真的有趣，很讨影迷喜欢。
“感谢你的诞生”这句话的意义要高于这整部影片吧。
停留在车窗上的花儿 小心翼翼能捏住 甩甩手也能把它撵走 但孩子却是一辈子的牵挂。素英在【生下来送出去】还是【存在就毁掉】哪个罪恶感更重的伦理线徘徊 得不出答案 东洙被问到【更远是哪里】也同样答不上来 也许一起洗车时开个窗大家都湿透了是快乐 窝在小镜头前合照一张留念是快乐 也许游乐场狂欢一下小游戏是快乐——也许只是大家凑在一起说说话一起笑笑就是快乐 本就这么简单不是吗？所以呀 摩天轮上用手挡在你面前 不是想给你打马赛克 因为你给了我太多可以原谅妈妈的理由 我只是简单的不想看到你哭 只愿 全天下的人 都能因为出生而得到感谢。（PS裴斗娜的侧脸好好看。IU也意外演得不错！）
满分喜剧片 要啥自行车 这就去把《帕丁顿熊2》看了去
感觉节奏不太好，差几口气。这创意本应该更好一些。
像是编剧写作班里事先确定好主题、配方后，精确勾兑出来的行货，每一种成分的克数都过了电子秤，进行了仔细的计算与配比。真实的世界里哪有解决得这么舒适、圆润的道德困境，哪有这么糖心的底层叙事。硬是努了三天劲儿才吃力地看完。看完只想立刻再去温习一遍《小偷家族》。
解构拍电影，解构凯奇大叔看似日薄西山的演艺事业，没想到还凑出了不错的可看性。
第3603-关了灯，IU躺下，觉得该放大招了，说出那几个谢谢后，我心里就像听到后胡乱挠头要睡觉的宋康昊，有那么一丝感动，却没达到期待，还有点抗拒进入情绪，索性就稀里糊涂过去了。
是我看过是枝裕和最低分的电影了，看起来是在舒适区的题材，但导演好像一点都不舒适啊，甚至能感觉到他的慌张和无所适从，我想不通，也许是这部电影有很多因素都不在他掌控之内吧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
