Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这想象力、这画面、这效果，再蠢的剧情也显得有点牛了
片中英国兵的战斗力相当于我国手撕鬼子片里的日本兵，爽片，希望印度人用这样的片子培养出的感情能对准高加索人种的罪恶而不是和中国互掐。总督夫人演得好，把高加索人的傲慢与恶毒充分展示了出来。
八分不解释，不看跟你急:）
广谱的entertainment，有歌舞，有动作，有悬疑，有bl
这强大的身体复原能力，这指哪打哪的超级功夫，还有唱歌跳舞的文艺才能，加上家国情怀，这就是印度武侠吧！神虎侠侣，地母八部……
故事挺俗但观影体验还不错？各种调侃自己&迷影烂梗，不允许这么说《卡里加里博士的小屋》哈！最后淡出银幕的处理挺像《瞬息全宇宙》，海报也好像，商业片同质化……？【恭喜凯奇喜提水仙，当然故事基调也挺给的（x）】
大场面，这不光是民族英雄，这还是超级英雄，三哥导演的脑洞我佩服的五体投地，被鞭笞也要放声歌唱，被打断腿也要迎体向上，太励志了，分两次看完，还是非常欢乐的，哈哈哈
感觉国内演员和阿三的一比都差一大截，至少人家能实打实的跳一段
印度的抗日神剧啊，哈哈，不过比国内的还是亮点多多了，好基友
两个男主都挺帅的，还以为会发展出一段旷世熊熊绝恋，没想到只是水火相融战友情，慢镜头剪了全片能提前一个小时结束。
印度抗英神片，经典祖传慢镜。平心而论娱乐性还凑合，三小时不觉得冗长。被男主一周吃一顿还坚持健身的精神深深打动。
节奏紧凑、场面宏大，镜头语言华丽，打戏带劲，两男主武力超级充沛😂演员方面，小老虎时而萌萌哒，拉姆查兰还是帅
印度人民最庆幸的是碰到的是英国人，如果换成俄国人和日本人，印度现在应该没有印度人的存在了。
被大英帝国殖民了200年。印度人民保留了它的民主制度。 电影很精彩。特么都神人。
woc我要怎么理解印度片的狂暴荷尔蒙含量和满屏的生殖崇拜
他们笑你是烂片之王，在我眼里，你是演过《离开拉斯维加斯》《火柴人》《鸟人》《空中监狱》《变脸》《勇闯夺命岛》《战争之王》《天气预报员》《居家男人》《天使之城》等经典、佳作（有多少演员一生能有超过十部佳片呢？），陷入泥潭后，没有放弃，就算在泥潭里爬，也一直在前行的汉子。你不是烂片之王，只是好剧本没有找上你。
弱智的剧情，独特的审美口味，三哥的抗英神剧。3个小时很欢乐就是了哈哈哈～
朝鲜被日本殖民过，所以如今两国势不两立！印度被英国殖民过，所以骨子里讨厌英国鬼子！台湾省被日本殖民过，如今对鬼子俯首帖耳，斯德哥尔摩综合征啊！
印度人的五官比例真的是好看，印度男人可以拯救世界了吧。
确实没必要拍这么长哈 很印度 很印度爽 从弗拉明戈到恰恰再到印度舞我是真的没想到
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
