Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
原来是吉屋出租composer原型
肉眼可见的那种好看，时刻感受着扑面而来的热爱与执着，生活与事业，友情和爱情，相互对照彰显出「人生处处是舞台」的真谛，歌舞不错，加菲表演出彩。
音乐剧电影最关键的是歌要好听，然而这部没有。加菲怎么有一点点像脸叔了!
十余年来时常倚靠一部剧集提供情绪价值足够可悲，而《唐顿庄园》似乎永远工整、高标准、符合期待，使我不能不指望。基于此的，我的意志只被允许终于无法对其产生情感反馈的那刻。
十年前，2012年，我仍然记得那晚，妈妈在厨房做凉皮给我吃，我打开了唐顿。
“时间从来不能阻挡梦想的脚步，正是因为无法轻易触及，才能令人为之疯狂”。tick, tick…Boom!
剧情一般，演员长相一般，歌曲也不好听，等了2个小时，一直在等一首抓耳的歌，结果也没等到，不知道为啥这么高的分。
开始会想是不是音乐剧电影和歌舞片之间有壁（也许音乐剧在形式上会部分压制电影的视听表现），后来觉得还是不该让个体影响对整体的判断，纯粹还是因为片子本身乏善可陈。坚持追梦的故事每天都在上演，关键是讲述的方式以及它所触及的本质。可能最致命的还是加菲的表演吧，用力过猛但又自矜自傲的状态实在让人腻烦。
老夫人的少女岁月南法线和唐顿拍电影《雨中曲》的有声电影萌发线无缝融合～男仆的故事被一剪梅～马修你还不回来大小姐要被休丹西撬走了喂～唐顿好美大家好可爱❤️
A well deserved farewell.
从开场便知这是这是一出无解悲剧，从各个方面都沉湎所谓梦的光芒里。
五颗星献给乔纳森拉森本人，come to your senses我可以无限循环。希望全世界所有怀抱梦想的人都百年不老。
加菲有追求，有前途～ 虽然现在看着还有点像表演工作室的学生…故事好美，每一个Jon人生中的时刻都牵动人心，但LMM这种快剪真的是看着好难受…可能老了受不了这么多又晃又快切的镜头。这是theatre没法剪辑后遗症么，能拍电影了就疯狂切镜头？
Jon的第一场试片会结束后，好评如潮但无人投资，他问经纪人“那我现在该怎么办？”，经纪人说“写下一部，写完了就再写一部，一直投稿直到有回应为止，这是大多数剧作家的宿命。”有才华的人终将被看到，需要的是时间和耐心。只不过除了这段，全片剧情和音乐都不怎么打动人，不及影片最后Jonathan Larson本人的影像有感染力。
因为不是百老汇粉丝，所以触动不是很大，无非就是梦想与现实作斗争的故事，主线很单薄，包括一些生活困境也就是没交上电费在餐馆打工这样的设定，都仰仗音乐出色以及演员卖力表演，倒数计时既是快到而立之年的时间警示，如今看又是男主短暂生命的预言，加菲唱得还不错，前女友石头姐靠音乐片得影后，看他自己能不能冲个影帝提名。
即使剧情老套而鸡汤而且舞台剧风格还是太明显，但这完美的音乐和加菲惊艳的表演还是不免让人忘却一切缺点。拥抱音乐与感动
更明白滴答滴答嘣，明白心底倒数的走针声。
生活和舞台的虚实切换非常棒，浓缩了生活流，也渲染了情绪。而且作为歌舞剧来说，歌是真的都好听。
排练和声段落，每个白人中间都夹着一名少数族裔，格外整齐。太服气了，有劲儿吗？真的开始觉得美国片不如法国片好看了。
乔纳森也是幸运的，有流星划过夜空的绚烂。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
