Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
人类的悲喜并不相通。感受不到成长，中心诉求；反而是拒绝讨论，封闭内心。如果溶入LCL之海是真正意义上的与人类和解，并且带有恶意，给出描绘所有人“普通”的结局就是真正意义上的拒绝和解，无恶意也无善意，没有感情波动。当然一切解读都是投射～安娜说是我对成长的定义和正常人不一样
我最喜欢NTR了，明日香已经变成剑介的形状了，哈哈哈哈
不知为什么想起我高中同桌，一个和真嗣一模一样的男孩。。
这次真的结束了。再见了，所有的少年们。さらば、すべてのエヴァンゲリオン。
主要时间都花在一秒一个新概念的战斗大场面和乡下种菜的日式鸡汤，至于剧情逻辑或人物发展基本靠粉丝自我脑补，补不上也可以说成是一种打破第四面墙的作者性（补完会引起人类末日呢……三颗星真的是谅解的极限。
人类就算长大了，人类还是需要EVA啊，不要离开。
上小学的我第一次看了Eva，那时的我什么都不懂，但大受震撼，后来我跟着剧场版看了一个全新的Eva ，我还是不懂，不懂为什么庵明老贼当初要写那么一个晦涩的故事，这次我都懂了，人最终会和自己和解，20年前和20年后，那都是他眼中的世界，再见了Eva。
对于我来说，EVA究竟意味着什么？为什么我会喜欢EVA？它入侵了我的生活，真正成为了我的一部分，我能够这样说吗？其实我不再想理解EVA了。每次看EVA，总觉得可以放弃很多执念，是无所谓吗？无所谓存在也无所谓毁灭。可这里不是EVA的世界。我不想这个世界如常运转。为什么我会变成这样？EVA这样就结束了吗？大概是的。大概不是。
https://www.zhihu.com/question/448189831/answer/1770013440
本来打了小四百字，然后全删了，没什么好说的了
前50分钟农家乐有点世外桃源的意思，后面的剧情就又回到中二日常，直到最后宇多田光的歌声响起，我又把结局拉回去再看了一遍，就这样吗？就这样。大家努力建立羁绊，努力解开心结，所有人都不再纠结，就好好活在一个没有EVA的世界里吧。然后，长大成人。
和与少年时代隆重的告别仪式
作为一个没看过EVA的人，说实话我没有看懂，但我大受震撼
一场上升到哲学神学的战争，一场不依赖于技术力量强弱的战争，还有啥好说的呢？大boss想要打造精神世界就是为了和亡妻重逢？不太懂。毕竟我不是这个系列的粉。画面还是不错的，但有些地方CG痕迹太浓
一九年年末我通关了《死亡搁浅》，而几分钟前我看完了EVA剧场版的最终章。
（但是最后的cp？还我香香）
在TOHO六本木拿到入场特典画册和色纸，感觉整个人又活过来了
伴随成长的同龄人如今早已不再中二，而是被现实裹挟的油腻麻木，一路走来早已懂王，但内心还是存有最初的纯真，所以结局充满了迎合粉丝的和解，算是不意外的终结了，就是人物关系太强行了。最可惜的是各种设计再也没有了当初的神秘感，过分的设计对接单纯的终极目的充满了迎合时代时尚的多余剧本设计，最后节奏直接可谓拉稀，创意枯竭再也没有曾经剧场版的神级惊喜了，失望至极。
大家都见人说人话，见鬼说鬼话
虽然好多剧情也听不懂，但是也不妨碍日语渣渣在明日香把眼罩摘下以后开始爆哭到片尾曲。加持x美里也好好哭，最后碇唯出来的时候也狠狠地哭了一把。其实比起真嗣，一个更加成熟的路人会更能带给香香安全感吧，所以本香党觉得有个温柔的人可以给香香爱也挺好的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
