A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
这也太好看了吧，灯光和配乐有点儿拉，剧情和场面调度的小细节也太惹人爱了吧，又是蓝宇又是阿飞正传，拥抱背景是十字架的背德文学，两人情感拉锯，外界冲突矛盾，都很到位呀；结局有点儿难以接受，太悲伤太扎心了吧，不如给个现在的剧情，就像刻在我心底的名字那种；拉片真的太少，但这一部真的不错，冲突再尖锐一点点更有味道，喜欢。
整部电影几乎都看不进去，亲吻交谈和床戏都感觉情绪不够，让人觉得有点别扭，不知道是剧情问题还是演技问题，此处对比的是《蝴蝶》。拉快进的方式直接来到婚礼，从靠近说“你的内衣又扣错了”开始感到震动，从这里到全片结束的五六分钟里，层层堆叠上去，眼泪在回忆画面两人坐在地板上看电视，女生睡着了，另一个靠近很温柔的说“我爱你”，此刻情绪被带到峰值。难究其因，但爱情它来过，存在过。
The first girl I loved，那就够了
很小清新，有些恋爱的细节部分和镜头处理得挺好的，就是这剧情发展和强行be有些说不过去。最后我是绞尽脑汁想了一个理由，就是短发女生那次悔过书深深伤害了长发女生所以一直无法原谅，最后只有沦为亲人。但是最后这婚礼上望眼欲穿又着实让人不解，嗐。
怎么还在拍校园故事啊啊啊！看到开头心里就咯噔一下，又是结婚当伴娘的drama！ 所以呢？就“我们永远是最好的朋友”？我只能说，远离直女，会变得不幸。p.s. 快二十年过去了，反而越来越倒退，《蝴蝶》里还有离婚和小叶一起的结局，这里就结婚当伴娘？！去他的好朋友，就那么缺朋友哦，躲在朋友的名义下享受着爱人的爱意可真行。以及，这一对的沟通看得头疼，全靠猜，都想给对方自己以为的好。双方对于自己的取向探索和认同几乎没拍出来，槽点太多，一言难尽。
也许
点解d糖果高光磨皮增亮滤镜全部传到去香港了，，，救命 这个高饱和度画面真的和香港电影风格完全不搭
一个作品不管再多外界评价，还是喜不喜欢能不能打动自己最重要，差点因为评分错过这么好看的一部电影，它确确实实有打动我。对男女感情的描述也好，对女女感情的表现也好，青涩的学生时期闭上眼按捺不住想亲吻对方的心情，影院握住手对方不自然坐直的表现，像是电流通过身体一样的感觉，谢谢带给我好久以来没有过的舒畅体验，在很多电影中我无法共情，但此刻我却可以
哭死我算了 女同性恋为什么总是这么惨 剧情很多硬伤
这个泡沫在剧终的婚礼呼应并且破碎了，碎得体无完肤，碎在了观众的脸上，化成热泪。
0遂boy，1終老，best friend，經典
本来写了一大段，然后豆瓣说“那么长你不如写影评”早知道选择“留在本页”而不是“好的”；白敲那么多字
故事很简单，画面也并不突出。让人觉得不舒服的还是结局，到底是什么心态能写出这种结局啊……
四星仅为支持数量不多的亚洲女同片
很多年前我也问过李咏蓝问李芯悦的问题。
节奏，演技，剧情都不太合常理。女主像杨恭如和李宇春的结合体。20220307
我觉得拍的很好啊，为什么分数这么低。情感推动情节真的很好，有时候女孩子之间的感情真的很复杂，不是用爱情或是友情简简单单就可以概括的。喜欢看百合也是因为这个吧，干干净净又纯粹动人。谁的一生没有勇敢爱过一个不可能的人呢，结局重要吗。不重要。因为曾经总想要一个故事结尾，但真正等到很多年后，会发觉也许什么都没那么重要了，回忆会美化很多很多相遇和离别，故事中的我们永远不会谢幕。
有一种导演在讲自己的故事的错觉，镜头细腻，色调梦幻，剧情比较琐碎冗余，复古的色调加上现实的剧情，好像过去的一切美好都是梦，要结束的终于都要结束了，但我却不愿意醒来。
我的右手边坐着一对异性恋，电影过半起，女生一直哭，哭到了全剧终。男生一言不发，起身就走了。
只能不断的跳过跳过跳过
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
