Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
从小就看好莱坞的家庭片，其实这样一成不变的状态也很好，就是很温暖的样子。挺舒服的！
看完了也想养只拉布拉多，剧情个别地方衔接不到位，喜剧感满分。
大修勾很可爱
大红狗挺可爱的，别的没啥了，适合十岁以下儿童观看
在并不逼真的特效和各种套路设定中，还是有被可爱到和打动到。毕竟爱狗子的人总会不自觉带着滤镜爱这样那样的狗子——小可爱变大不还是可爱的吗，再巨大又如何，who cares？！
看过夏雨的剧版，期待感大减。
如果给小孩子看感觉还不错，巨大的毛茸茸太可爱了。
大狗虽大，可爱不减。剧情不算多么新奇出彩。
- 不，你不想
这种合家欢的电影本来就是看了开头就知道结局，期待的就是那种观影过程的快乐感满足感，给你一段童话时间。群演真的是越来越像游戏中的路人。人类越来越像素化。
一整个都太陈旧老套了，锤自己爷爷是汉奸倒是新鲜，李现可以重修台词吗？猜到佛头去向的我以为药不然是AI，刚学会几句中文时刻准备上台演讲那种
虽然是儿童片，但这也太儿戏了……里面所有角色包括邻居NPC的感情发展都好像跳过了一季度剧情，说教极度尴尬生硬。狗倒是可爱的。
哈哈哈哈，美帝白男废柴的问题靠中国有钱人来解决的思路。白人小女孩在学校受欺负，中国小男孩伸出援手，不仅善良而且还是个天才小黑客；他家像个博物馆，他爸爸在上海有个珍奇动物园。看得我觉得中国人民真的是站起来了。。
还是很搞笑的。
average movie for kids，剧情无脑适合小孩子，演员演技还不错，舅舅太好笑了。
寓教于乐、传播积极讯息的合家欢，剧情也离不开“搞得一团糟- 反派暗藏阴谋-流泪大成长的好结局”的三件套走向。最近的类比是年初的《猫和老鼠》，但两相比照之下，《猫》过于有认知度，不慎操作就“滤镜稀碎”；但这里却因为对原著和影视化前作都不熟悉，没有任何对比。只觉得大红狗的设计被处理得意外合适，没有因为「大」产生惊吓，也未有因为缺乏神韵捕捉从而脱离实际。小女主是《大小谎言》“Madeline”的女儿，意外看好她接下来的发展；白墙真的太适合演这种「怪舅舅」的角色了~
以及李现的演技在雷佳音的对比下有点不能看。
对狗子就是没啥抵抗力
人类不能实现和平的原因之一便是有这种种族歧视无聊至极的烂片存在！
抛开拖沓无趣的剧情，稀碎的镜头，老旧的叙述方式，亚裔的刻板影响的话这部电影是真好看啊。我不明白，为什么一定要大红狗，这狗子的颜色像沾了血一样难以直视，就大狗不行吗
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
