Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
7分吧。题材其实蛮不错，设定也很有趣，结尾“不，只有一个人”又是突如其来的感动。
没想到搞来搞去最后是个爱情片，没有说爱情片不好的意思，但这种一顿操作猛如虎定睛一看原地杵的操作，实在有点……
开始会有点无厘头，看到20分钟左右才知道演的是什么剧情，很有趣，为什么那么多人都要去救你，其实只有一个人
太喜欢舞台版的，这个让我很失望。一分给John和Bianca。删了很多细节，最让人难受的是老师人物形象超扁平。没了铺垫，有些词很怪，又不改。删了很多好歌。呃呃后半段还能看(是我的错觉还是男主的眼睛一直瞪着。)
第3385-挺有扩展空间的概念拘泥于老套而普通的警匪故事当中。
题材挺新颖，中间的枪战动作戏也不错，但刚开始看的确实有点懵逼，不过将自己带入也还好，值得一看。
故事人物太多，变来变去的看着真累。不过，演得都不错。
听说舞台剧更好看，留一星给舞台剧。这是一个关于变装皇后Jamie的故事，关于他的接纳的故事。他的自我接纳，勇敢走出梦想的那步，并且用自己的勇敢征服了周遭的亲人，老师，朋友，甚至是敌人。虽然略有遗憾（爸爸无法接受），但他的故事足够感人。电影里的歌舞也非常好看，虽然没有特别好听的歌曲出现，但都非常有感染力，能将观众拉进情绪里。期待看到原版的音乐剧。
感觉电影版的人物少了些戏剧化的感觉，但人物塑造的相对更舒服一些。
——他们都是同一个人。
反派要杀男主先给男主打药，这也有逻辑硬伤，
“找自己”“我是谁”“我要去哪”
题材很好，只是剧情结构太轻易让人知道后面的发展，差那么一点意思。
7分吧。题材其实蛮不错，设定也很有趣，结尾“不，只有一个人”又是突如其来的感动。
半小时，看不下去了，同样讲drag queen，pose比这个的立意深刻多了...
设定还行
拍的什么玩意？jamie唱的也不行，演的也一般，女老师的work of are唱的也很弱，舞台表现也没有那么强。整个舞台能看出来想要弄艺术流，剪辑和特效还搞得不错的。
Suddenly, I vanished.
bug是有点多，但导演有点东西，取景设定和运镜都颇有亮点，前半段稍微加速后的打斗效果更显流畅打击感更强，后半段的持枪边打边射有点铁雨的意思
下载看的，开场相当惊艳，充满悬疑，后面就开始不合情理，凭什么就这么几个人换来换去要是换到死的咋办！还有什么鬼东西，竟然灵魂还能根据看到的人跑来跑去，完全没逻辑，凑合看看吧。。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
