A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
严肃话题拍得很喜剧不易。不知为何最后看出点及时行乐的意思来。
没有养老的资金，养老需要准备上佰万，不然你将只能过低配戚苦的晚年世界，当下的你，准备好了吗？
4
太一般了。日本社会经济情况不好 于是挑出了【家庭和谐（婆媳关系）】和【住房紧张】两个热点问题 给市民灌安慰剂。笃子本来就人畜无害 所以婆媳关系在钱还能让家人吃饱穿暖的情况下完全没有看点 不过诈骗养老金那一段拍得还挺有意思。住房紧张则拍得避重就轻了 公租房便宜人人皆知 和不认识不同背景的人相处才是劝退的去公租房的主要原因 但导演只用了一起烧烤一起制作花瓶两件美好的事搪塞过去。“人有时候要活得任性一点” 但根本在于如何有这个任性的资本呢？而且是你一个老婆婆坐在奔驰车里对人说这句话 难免让人有何不食肉糜的唏嘘。天海佑希老了 但气质好好 一点都不像会为钱烦恼的女人 这个老太太不认识但演得挺好的。
这才叫真婚姻生育劝退片。列出了非常现实的处境，办丧事，办婚礼，和父母同住，中年失业，哪一个都让人绝望啊。最后的happy ending显得很刻意，现实要比这残酷得多。不过中年再住share house倒的确是个不错的想法。
蛮搞笑的，剧情中规中矩，就是讲经济萧条也要保持好心态保持希望。天海这个身高233这么多年笑容依旧阳光灿烂。
情感陪伴和经济支持同等重要啊，未来的不确定性给养老很大压力。个人只能尽量筹谋。享受孤独吧，终点只能单身前往。
本来还以为会有点沉重的，没想到笑到肚子痛，不知道时隔多久地在电影院笑出声了www真的放轻松点才能活得开心
看到最后，好家伙，share house推广定制剧？！（笑
是喜剧啊，就不要要求太高，大家笑一笑就好了，何必太认真。前半段喜剧效果强，后半段走温情路线，这样的婆媳关系大概也只有电影中才有吧。演员都是实力派，不过女主还真看不出50多了，更不要提真的年近90的婆婆的扮演者，怎么精神这么好！婆婆演技更好！结局还是太理想化了，合租也会有很多问题，尤其是疫情之下，而且找到合适的志同道合的人又那么难。还是喜欢电影中老奶奶的气质，不论年龄如何。
很轻松但又不轻松 不过能启迪的 花那么多钱在置办葬礼 却成为了别人的圈套之物 生活不易 公司倒闭 合同到期 还有儿女的婚礼 真是糟糕透了 好在 这是一对好父母 尽管遭遇那么多怪事 但大家都不会花在埋怨 而是尽力想办法解决 最后 工作落实 房屋变卖 然后合租 换来了更多的资金 还可以变得更开心 就是说 与其总是陷于生活的圈套中 不如跳出来看看更好的生活方式 可是 能活在如此轻松的剧情里 简直是个奇迹
20220714 电视
女王大人真是到什么岁数就演什么角色啊，从耽美，到女王，到家庭主妇，完全不出戏，特别是恋妻家宫本和这一部，跟松重丰和阿部宽，两个截然不同风格的演员搭戏，自己的风格都是始终如一，接地气，难得难得。
就这么说吧，单就日本社会，养老金没有一方面是存款不足，二来是政府出不起钱。
为什么看到最后会觉得整个片子像share house的硬广？
这个如此作孽的童话故事看得我十分忧伤，女王和五郎叔都救不了。
海锅和叔就是来搞笑的吧，太好笑了~这个壳子不太适合海锅啊，触及实际问题但无法解决，片子就图一乐~
婆婆给10w那里好感动，但是前面铺垫那么久我都还是以为钱会省下来花给家人。看到那个包的时候，想起了妈妈，她好像也从来没给自己买过一个包~
其实，在电影最后，后藤夫妇的困难并没有得到本质的改变，但他们的生活状态发生了质的改变。由之前从超过自己能力的生活方式调整到适应自己能力的生活方式，思路打开了，生活也更舒适了。这是这部电影的重点，可不是像一些评论说的“没钱也可以开心”。你看到那些没钱也开心的人，他们绝对不是因为没钱所以开心，而是因为找到属于自己的平衡所以开心，物质和幸福感在两个逻辑轨道上，智慧在于平衡二者，而不是说你单方面可以因为其一而有其二。
中间那段我与婆婆的诈骗段子真的好好笑😂😂😂
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
