Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
逼婚逼生小孩那裡看得讓人窒息，但是現實更讓人窒息，唉，can’t talk feeling something 💔
刚看一半，忍不住了，真的好看。你难以相信这是印度片，也难以相信，没有阿米尔汗，印度也能输出这么好的片子。我们都应该学习，冒险和创新的勇气，这才是艺术的价值
好甜！好甜！最后画面停留在五口之家的时候本人流下了最真诚的彩虹色泪水啊！
宽容度满分，情节无新意节奏缓慢，剧情从一小时以后就变连续剧。不过可以公映，也反映了当地的文明进程吧
女主医院邂逅的片段，想起08年在北京一所医院看牙时，对面的医生让我姬达响了，而且她有意无意让我听到她的手机铃声—《如果的事》。但后面没有任何后续了。此情可待成追忆，只是当时已惘然。
结局皆大欢喜，过程也波澜不惊。愿都能正大光明的生活在彩虹之下
这部真的惊艳到我！lgbtq+领养问题诠释得非常精彩，虽然中间一度担心男女主角为孕变直。结尾男主邀请partner坐到身边还是有点感动。宝莱坞悄悄在变，我们呢？
印度都拍出来了啊。。。。。能想象我全程都在替换成中国面孔代入在看是怎样一种感受吗。。。。没什么新花样，放在欧美就是套路了，但在东亚刻画得非常应景，每一个妥协都很现实。看完挺难受的。
这大概就是我心里《中邪》拿到足够多预算后能呈现出来的样子。
形婚gay也会觉得女人应该端茶倒水给男人服务
用喜剧的形式探讨了同性问题，电影用两个同性形婚的方法，题材新颖
当然探讨社会议题确实需要加分，但它根本没触及到现实问题的灵魂，整个故事从头到尾都过于理想化。
4-5、7 故事还是那种没触及很深的喜剧，戏剧冲突也很少，人物变化也很表面，总之就是噱头大于内容。但是也是想念印度，现在看着电影里的画面，又在恍惚自己真的经历过那些生活在印度的日子吗？真实又遥远
这可能是2022年上半年最棒的一部电影了。讲的故事还是老生常谈的出柜，虽然最后是个大团圆结局。毕竟能看到印度已经往前迈进了那么多了。整部片子笑中带泪。如果你们觉得她无药可救，那我也无药可救了。
虽然一直说印度电影的坏话 但是总是有勇气一直拍具有争议话题的电影呀
近几年欧美同影已经往纯爱或者黑暗时刻反思方向走了，相对保守的印度却开始从认同说起，也是一种进步
不能写也不能沉默的东西太多！一部电影它做得了什么呢？
轻谐风但是有些地方不够深刻，没有把那种homo真正的孤独感展现出来。
节奏不算好，但在印度这个题材真的勇敢，继上次的维权律师之后，印度又赢了一把。人家开始拍彩虹平权，我们在不让说就不存在。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
