Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
好土我好喜欢 电梯里的吻真是氛围感拉满
本来是两分的 然而男主弯腰抱女主的时候我该死的心动了
（豆瓣真空期补标9月末-12月）私人口味，无法解释，我就是钟情这样的风格。有点暗黑，时间对等，完全在场。
太失望了 有史以来第一次踩雷 要演技没演技要颜值没颜值 书理重点讲的都一笔带过了 抓不住重点 要不还说拍个剧吧
一边打竞争法笔记一边听生肉都能知道剧情以及男女主之间巨老套的七七八八 当然是深夜肥皂剧范畴 但不得不说女主真的好漂亮！
一把年纪了，看这样的爱情喜剧确实是没有啥感觉了。剧情一般，台词设计还是很不错的，很有挑逗意味。一部普通的爱情电影被定义为R级，实际上却啥也没有，可见台词有多么的dirty……三星！
3.5。片子细碎而冗长，弥漫着一种萧索的氛围，一如主角的心境。还以为是讲述一个天才的赌片，没想到最后是一个人的赎罪之旅。这种独立电影的气质略显沉闷却又莫名的引人入胜。大反派居然是威廉达福？
十年前的晋江水平吧，关键是真的难以get男女主的火花，这种片子剧情都是其次，主演一定要有feel啊！
想要放空的时候看这种爱情喜剧真的很不错 飞机上看看 感觉行程都轻松愉悦了不少 男女主都好看 很有性张力 谈恋爱就要亲亲抱抱啊！
7.5/出人意料的最后赌局，湮灭于无法治愈的痛，就好像相互间隔着透明可视的玻璃却无法企及彼此的内心。
无聊的爱情口水片，两个主演都挺令人讨厌的，怪不得叫《the hating game》。
观感和《第一归正会》还是很像的，但这部更好懂一些。。
改编的没我脑补的好😌种草了“go away I'm reading”的杯子
这个片真是尴尬与好笑并存，不过展现一下当代时尚生活，比如装修，还是值得肯定的
前几天被雪滴花虐的没边了所以半夜看完本片，剧情简单易懂，没中文字幕也能看个差不多，男女主之间有点chemistry，所以虽然没啥演技也能完成个七七八八。
挺无聊的，各种幼稚园游戏搬进办公室，白天互相伤害，晚上就限制级春梦，第二天就情不自禁热吻，搞不懂。不过俩人嘴炮攻击还是挺加分的，损人不用脏字。
纽漂的大学毕业生周末在朋友家一起看的电影。看完了就出去喝一杯那种
老套经典，服化好看，男主衣服都很好看😊，太多老梗了，没有特别新意，bgm不错
剧情有点儿戏，男女主颜值一般，男主满脸褶子。但是轻松喜剧好看就完事儿了。
职场浪漫爱情喜剧，两个人互相斗气的时候真的十分小学生比较常规的职场爱情喜剧
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
