Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
小时候看的，虽然很久远了，但是知道当时觉得特别赞，哈哈。那个时候我 还年幼
我拥有这部作品的漫画版，哦，那个年代叫做小人书。剧情很赞！起承转合都很赞！无论是正派还是反派都刻画的那么到位。苍天啊，那时的国产动画真好！
小时候的那些毛骨悚然，那些刻板印象却久久挥之不去，老动画的魅力。
以后再也不会有这样的国产动画了。官方，不管是人间还是仙界，都混蛋。百姓可爱，但又愚昧。依靠反思的仙人和蛋解救世界的幻想。
柯南剧场版一年比一年失望，小新剧场版从没让人失望。没想到一部子供向的动漫剧场版能达到这样的高度和深度，这让我想起那部大人反击战。
八十年代的浪漫主義動畫，袁公像中國的普羅米修斯
11.14.07.Secrets.Of.The.Heavenly.Book.1983_天书奇谭
之前没看过蜡笔小新剧场版，第一次看没想到惊艳到这种程度，前半段想聊的点特别多，科技提升衍生出的伦理问题(AI完全取代教师职能) 日本特有的精英(エリート)文化 从众心理 日本严重的重视规则(ルール) 只通过评分(工资)来judge人的高低 还有阶级固化带来的阶级矛盾 ，讨论的不深但是每一点都无比真实。后半段热血的部分真实影院爆哭(被身边的人关心着和在乎着的感觉最高) 后来听一直是蜡笔小新铁粉的女票说剧场版的脚本监督一直是adventure time的团队，恍然大悟 (btw安利下神剧AT 心中Top1白月光
至今仍在心中留着最美的印象
抱着看“国货精品”的期望去看，画面和音乐是很用心，配音极具时代感，但剧情……反正我很有意见！没想到是个悲情结局，蛋生抱着被铁链捆住的袁公时，鼻子一酸，最笨的神仙最深明大义。
压抑，蛋生的声优装嫩-1。俺正太时期看到师傅被抓走的时候都哭了。。师傅长得像达摩。瘸子，邪恶老太，美艳小娘子，荒唐县令。
袁公的显妖镜、邓布利多的冥想盆以及门卫大叔的监控屏幕都在深邃地揭示电影的本体意义
又是美色的问题，比现在的希奇古怪有意思多了。
我宣布 这是蜡笔小新的所有剧场版里面我最喜欢的一部！！
我哥哥现在的女朋友长得很像这部动画里的老狐狸精！！！
剧本很扎实，有悬疑人设的障眼法，也有故事细节的闪光点。
一神仙带着天书下凡（类似于普罗米修斯，他的结局也像），无奈天书被三狐狸精吸取四处作乱，而男主则是真正向神仙学习了天书要去主持公道，最终男主打败三狐狸精并从此利用天书的能力造福于民。虽然角色“表演”太浮夸叙事也较拖，但影片作画的确水平很高很有想象力，配乐也很好。
神作，画风特别，妖怪为祸人间，蛋生匡扶苍生，一本天书妙趣横生，原来袁公乃国产普罗米修斯一枚也。
并不觉得这部片子如其评分和评价一般神乎其神，但的确反映出四十年前的动画作品走的是于当下不同且显著高于当下的路子。观影的时候不断思考两个问题：一是国内的动画（和动画之外）何至于自我阉割至今天的水平；二是作为艺术的动画或许不只如皮克斯工作室代表的极度逼真一条发展路线，几笔线条带来的审美体验完全可以不输计算机营造的极致光影。
每次伟大真相被人类获知的时候，背后都有先行者的抗争和牺牲。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
