A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
很多观众会把这部影片和《中国医生》做比较。对《中国医生》差评的较多，这也是意料之内的。首先，这两部影片呈现形式上不能说对与错，只是国家意识形态不同。影片中的国家（或者说该影片）强调的是个人在灾害面前的反应，国家中的个体与政府有种“对抗”的关系。而《中国医生》是以国家层面宏观叙事了。直观的感受是影片《援助》完整讲了一个故事，《中国医生》像一些琐碎的情节拼凑而成。《中国医生》的制片人和导演肯定明白这部影片的水平，但在当下，只能那么拍。
i love you acctully. i love you too. 我以为你爱他们，但如果你这么做了 你就和其他人没区别了。
善良和同理心有时候就是在事态变化时候油然而生的，可能很疯狂但是也很无奈
很多观众会把这部影片和《中国医生》做比较。对《中国医生》差评的较多，这也是意料之内的。首先，这两部影片呈现形式上不能说对与错，只是国家意识形态不同。影片中的国家（或者说该影片）强调的是个人在灾害面前的反应，国家中的个体与政府有种“对抗”的关系。而《中国医生》是以国家层面宏观叙事了。直观的感受是影片《援助》完整讲了一个故事，《中国医生》像一些琐碎的情节拼凑而成。《中国医生》的制片人和导演肯定明白这部影片的水平，但在当下，只能那么拍。
总会联系到今年最让我动容到收藏的帖子里一个网友的评论 说的就是网友自己的祖母住在养老院然后临终前都因为疫情见不到自己的亲人而给这些儿孙们留下一辈子的伤痛和遗憾
动机一直模糊不清，最后的发问更是无力，这又不是Killing Eve，真人真事改得太抓马了。
最后怎么就把人家拐跑了呢（i get it, but…）
死亡之下，就只剩下最后那一点点狼狈的自由，为什么不去追寻？
1.电影并不是抗疫的主题，新冠只是背景，表现的还是人。
恭喜Jodie再获BAFTA，作为演员的Jodie Comer是天赐的礼物
个人认为是抗击新冠题材中最好的电影。直面问题、讲真话、能讲出来，这都是珍贵的美德了……
“It's not my department, love.”
热评的这些是舔出了优越感了么？片子是好片子，不同视角审视反思社会的不足恨触动人，但吐酸水的真的还是早点移民吧。
小变态的演技和故事的真实性打4🌟，很多镜头很模糊，不知道是特意为之还是…
3.5两位主演的表演非常不错…
热泪盈眶，酸楚的眼泪。灾难之下，人道主义被国家机器拆分成冷冰冰的优先级，处在高优先级的人们——我们，在和平时期不费力地怜悯他人，这时候也紧抓着既得资源无暇他顾。when did our lives stop being worth the same？有几人能没有羞愧地正视这句话？
原本以为就是描述特殊护理院的日常，料想到了会有生离死别，会有艰辛，但没想到是一部以小见大的抗疫电影。没有过多的煽情，没有激烈的场面，却轻易就把当时历经这一切的人心中茫然、害怕，绝望一下勾了出来。说怎么会带着病人出走，我想在那种极端情况下，在末日感下，也是情有可原。另一方面，也讽刺了当局的该管不管、正做不做吧。
该电影讲述了全球疫情灾难期间英国🇬🇧一家护理院的日常生活情况。
没有家国大义，没有感动中国式的煽情，只有孤立无援下的绝望和直接单纯的善良，演员们演技都太好了。有时候都忘了疫情最开始的无助，不知不觉已经戴着口罩过了两个夏天了。
中段那个26分钟的长镜头感染力太强了，精准地呈现了新冠之下小人物的至暗时刻，那种被整个社会背叛的无力与绝望，让人心如刀绞～但第三幕逃离疗养院的情节有些刻意且过火了，为了煽情而煽情，破坏了冷峻克制的旁观视角，也失去了现实感染力～
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
