A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
并非体育传记片，在其中你看不到对网球的热爱与梦想，只能看到一个有着极端控制欲的父亲是如何教育出优秀、自信的女儿们的。威尔史密斯精准的表达是绝对加分项，不那么过头也不那么惹人讨厌，那是威廉姆斯姐妹眼中的父亲。
别的也说不出啥，我每次都被这种励志电影感动的稀里哗啦，只要努力成功，果真会得到所有人的认可和尊重。国王理查德确实是够专制，但是他确实是走的一条好路。
快把奥斯卡给Will Smith吧，演得是挺好，但也看累了。这片子，要努力说服自己才能不去翻白眼，大威小威当然是牛逼的，但是比赛全都没有起伏，戏眼全都在他爹身上，关键是这个爹又没立得住，光在那鸡娃惹人讨厌了，就挺烦的。另外各种陈词滥调确实也是每年颁奖季能看到180部的那种，片尾真实影像一出，电影白拍了。但片尾曲不错，Beyoncé还是slay！
有点像摔跤吧爸爸。父亲的角色是复杂的。大威小威的传奇倒是有点吸引我。缺点，太长了，本来100分钟左右就可以讲完的，以及作为一部体育电影还是缺少了一点燃的味道吧。
这不就是《夺冠》？只是嫁接着美国虎爹的事实故事。一样的以大篇幅段落去毫无必要地表演已经历史定格的竞技体育赛事。而那场漫长的网球赛事，维纳斯的西班牙对手维卡里奥，2021年7月有可能因为欺诈、躲债和逃税而面临4年的牢狱之灾。
【3】闯入虚构的纪录，某种程度上正是话筒刺破庸常，动作与内容统一：收“音”。但只剩一个聪明的方法，内容实在没什么意思。
搞不懂亦碰不得，代际关系欠沟通。
2022-03-25 导演究竟是不是从Get Out剧组里逃出来的？剧作也是分裂得可以，我打球是为了让我离黑人远点，但是打完球却希望黑人能隔我近点。
马克吐温说，写作很简单，只需要把错误的词划掉。好电影也很简单，只需要把冗余的段落剪掉。啰嗦两个小时还不如最后一小段真实影像来的猛烈，是最大的失败。
那种陪伴着年轻数十岁的自己 探索这个奇妙世界的感觉 疲倦不堪也浪漫不已
中规中矩的八序列法剧本，威尔史密斯影帝锁了吧，导演的功底很一般。
大小威的伟大无需赘言。 小威几乎就是女网的goat 黑人的超强爆发力确实让两姐妹受益良多。也很难得有个这样有远见的爸爸。
又一套好莱坞流水线工业品，哪怕是关乎运动，你也很难从中燃起激情。这都能提名奥斯卡最佳影片，所以别总借主旋律来踩我朝的奖项，大家彼此彼此。就电影呈现的人设来看，理查德值得敬佩，但难以讨喜。
在美国，黑人想要摆脱混乱的社区只需要做三件事，高中毕业，找一份稳定的工作，先结婚后生子。但这对很多美国黑人来说都是一种奢侈，而威廉姆斯姐妹的父亲走的更远。
非常工整平稳的传记片，被家庭、种族和励志层层包裹着，几乎是瞄准着颁奖季在使劲。威尔史密斯对理查德的刻画是成功的，但整个电影都是一个精心编织的谎言，或者说加工过滤的真实，大威小威姐妹俩不该只是理查德威廉姆斯“国王”的注脚。
#金帧9th#HOME4th 20220301
好莱坞变态老爸鸡娃片。史皇来出演的意义就是本领域(电影)的黑人佼佼者扮演另一领域(网球)的黑人佼佼者(的父亲。史皇表演当然够格，就是不那么有必要，而且角色的走向偏戏剧，偏“观众愿意看到的”而必然背离了真实原型本身。
写网球名将大威小威成长的体育励志片，主角却是她们的父亲，当然也简化了这一真实人物的复杂人生，进行了“过滤”。应该是美国的“政治正确”的主旋律电影，据说剧本写成后、曾遇到不少干涉、修改。男主获个表演奖是有可能的，其他没有多少可说的。
平铺直叙虎爸鸡娃传记片，侧重于父亲的硬式教育而非大小威，中间还不少刻意的政治正确桥段，颁奖季讨巧型。
说实话，我觉得Will Smith可以吊打那群小子，字面意思。爸爸掌控着整个家庭，就像题目所言，他就是国王。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
