Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
为什么要“生硬”的设计成这么复杂又巧合的人物关系呢，为什么不简单平常一些，省却前面那些费劲的交代不好吗？
一部对话片，但是很精彩，尤其是被告律师，牛逼。
控辩双方律师给人印象十分深刻。辩方律师是司法指定的，竟然全力以赴为男孩辩护，控方律师则是一位漂亮、干练的女律师。双方最后陈词很精彩。
非常不错的法国影片，一改法国电影“浪漫”的印象。通过一起扑朔迷离的强奸案件，涉及阶层、文化，性别等多方纠葛对立，显得案情异常复杂；片子没有从上帝视觉展现事件的全部真相，而是像真正庭审一样，着重从男女主角视觉展现各方人物的观点，观众在电影结束前也不敢肯定自己掌握了事件的真相。庭审结束时三个律师的结案陈词精彩异常，特别是那位年轻女律师的发言真是震耳发聩，堪称女权宣言，而那位主张男主缓刑的律师似乎表达了主创人员的观点，起到平衡的作用。
TV完结后的两年，因为永恒核心的不稳定（拉伊拉的阴谋），使得剑悟再度回归，而泽塔也追击赛雷布洛来到此处。
导演结尾的最后一个镜头就是我的答案。
感觉看了一部现代版《最后的决斗》，台词量太大了，太难了拍这种电影。还是那句老话，我觉得我们在讨论男权和女权之前，更应该先站在人性的角度来审查事件本身。
吴京-乘风，章子怡-诗，徐峥-鸭先知，沈腾-（才看完就忘记名字了），完成度最好的是章子怡导演和主演的第二个故事，故事和情感完整，小男孩演得很好尤其放孔明灯的一段。
节奏容易看不下去 内容的微妙大概每个女孩都或许曾感同身受
我真的很好奇，把这些好演员聚在一起，怎么会拍出这么难看的东西，，我是真好奇。
前两个故事沉重悲壮，后两个故事轻松快乐，很好的诠释了不同时代的基调。四段命题作文，四位导演各有千秋。
答：编剧不是久弥直树。
前半小时对家庭关系的琐碎铺陈让我以为又是一部关于欧洲中产阶级内部世界的情感流动故事，但后面罗生门的展开让它变得更有意思。没有去呈现任何一种客观事实，但却分门别类地整理、陈列好了所有主观事实，不仅仅是所有局外人都无法窥见事实的本身，甚至当事人双方的视角都可以截然不同地描述同一件事，面对根本无法厘清的黑白对错需要有怎样的指向，这是庭辩戏发展到2.0模式之后需要去思考的地方。
这个系列，无疑是希望要引起大家的共鸣和感动。但是者却是这些章节里最缺乏的，因为他们承载了太多的任务，离真实和接地气太远了。唯一让自己引起共鸣是那段曾经的广告。
证人出场的部分真是看得牙痒痒，被告一方的辩护人、证人一直声称他从未有过暴力倾向，可证人中也不乏经历过与案件情节一样的遭遇，唯一的不同是当事人没有提出控告。Viol案件真的可以说是最难胜诉的案件了吧，从报案到最后庭审，受害人要一遍一遍回忆并且讲述被侵害的全过程，包括实质性的侵犯，也包括每一句言语羞辱。这些在案发当场就会给受害者留下心理创伤的细节要一遍一遍地告诉每一个认识和不认识的人，还要因为自己生平的每一丝丝言行举止做出合理完美的解释，否则就会得到被告律师不怀好意的一笑。全程受害人精神崩溃，以泪洗面。而那个真正被审判的人却可以保持傲慢，坚持声称被害人是自愿并且享受的。真的是太无力了！
一个事实两种感知，没有真相，或有机会主义强奸，只有红色警戒，么有灰色地带，no means no…silence does not means yes…沉默并非同意，拒绝就是拒绝；ask for yes before you going on….. one night stands or one night rape ? what if your daughter told you she was raped, what will you do? Kill him.
庭审戏太精彩了，台词量大的戏一般不爱看，但这部精彩到想要二刷。真相是绝对的吗？真相难道只在每个人心里吗？
2022年6月18日观看。这个社会问题看来不光是中国有，而是全球性的。该去斗争的对象不是男权而是皇权。是阶级斗争而不该是性别对立。
人间世事 要女性不要圣母 于是那女孩被判了终身监禁 男孩就此失去了存在性
通过原被告双方的对质，当事人和律师的讲述，逐渐展现了事件及当事人双方的心理状态（说谎，隐瞒等等等等）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
