A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
智利导演+美国女演员，诠释了英国戴安娜王妃的三天时光，就像拿了好几次金酸梅最差女演员的暮光女小K操着一口英国腔一样，本身就是件很难完成的事情。我对戴妃没有太多了解，也没看过暮光之城，就电影和演员本身而言我挺喜欢的，小K能从最差女演员一跃晋级可以提名奥斯卡女主的表演是值得尊敬的。导演在细节挖掘氛围营造节奏把控等方面都展示了一个大师级的沉稳。奥斯卡至少能提一个最佳服装设计吧。
将王室的枷锁和婚姻的束缚展现到了极致，无时无刻的跟拍特写，低沉压抑的配乐，一次又一次的挣脱和反抗，逐渐让观众拥有感同身受的体验。斯图尔特很精致很努力，但仍有大量演的痕迹，包括她那刻意的口音。
放大的表情和阴间的音乐都营造出了焦虑，导演目的达到了。
嗓音很奇怪，像是在拍惊悚片。个人感觉配乐有点抢戏。小k、queen，整个王室都没有贵族的气质。
Maggie神来之笔。K好努力，不过Diane真的不好演。
好难共情反而给我一种戴安娜在无理取闹……好多人夸小K的演技我也是不懂（摊手
小k给人一种用力过猛的感觉，可惜真实结局远不是电影中的那样*配乐又是绿木，拿捏到位
镜头与配乐都好，拍出了戴妃脆弱与神经质的一面，小K的表现也不错，有些镜头真的觉得很像。但整部片过于着重呈现一种状态，让所有的脆弱无望显得自艾自怨。
小k神颜神腿一星，服装一星，史诗级灾难配乐
小视角固然是一种选择，然而导致了片中所有角色的极度扁平，即便是戴安娜。戴妃的困境绝不全然来自家庭的规训、婚姻的不幸；她自有她身为王妃的矛盾，她的悲哀，却也绝不该是安妮·博琳式的宫闱稗史。而拉雷恩则几乎将戴安娜视作一个可悲的、极度缺爱的精神病患者，一个一心追求自由内心空虚的怨妇：她脆弱不堪如同易碎的花瓶，她不断堕入幻觉不断地歇斯底里，她的反叛不过是换装、跳舞、在海滩上狂奔，她一面关心儿子们的安危、一面带着儿子们作无视前路的危险的飙车。可是，戴安娜竟然是这样的人吗？那么无数对准她的摄像头又是在捕捉些什么呢？只是要偷拍她换衣服吗？
为什么戴安娜在炸鱼薯条店向普通平民问路时会如此矫揉造作？为什么全片包括和俩宝贝儿子在一起都用恶狠狠的语气讲话？无法接受。
事实上是完成了一次《闪灵》的再造，空洞的大宅、幽灵、梦境与幻象。爵士鼓点与运动长镜思及《鸟人》——相同的焦虑感。沉稳的封闭性空间构图以及在戴安娜的近景与特写镜头中不安分的摄影运动，嵌套的蒙太奇确实加强了阶级与皇室贵族的限制力量，戴安娜强烈的渴望挣脱牢笼的冲动同样在观众这里得到了感受，直至最后我才意识到这是一个发生在90年代的故事。可将问题的解决与自我家族血统的认同相联系的处理方式似乎感觉略微轻浮。最后，克里斯汀的表演始终是没能深入到我的内心。她很卖力了，但遗憾就遗憾在我看出了她的卖力。
过满的情绪与表演先行于故事，加之故事本身十分之平，于是产生了非常割裂的感受
排场肃穆华贵，服化道都无可挑剔，女主扮相美艳动人，梨花带雨楚楚可怜。就以电影表达来理解戴安娜王妃的失态是不够的，甚至会觉得查尔斯王子说得没错：你就像一个没被宠够的孩子，我们必须有二种面孔，对公众的一面要尽力负责。也许是戴妃的生平太被英国人熟悉了，影片就不在观众的同情面上进行铺垫了。但对海外观众来说，会觉得王妃的抑郁不可理喻。
氛围情绪都到了 情节有点一般 但是能有那种感同身受的悲伤与窒息 加一星吧
戴安娜本人有太多影像资料存世，尤其前几年还放出来一些更私人的自述，对于像不像这件事，个人其实不是很在意，就当一种阐述看就行。可是KS的演技尽力是尽力了，被人质疑“矫揉造作”也能理解批评的点。不过这个毫无共情点的剧本，我也想不出有几个演员才撑得起来。
不了解真实的戴安娜王妃是什么样子，但K女士的演绎实在是让人浑身难受。 我不理解，我不认同。
王室的束缚，逃掉才是自由。
虽然很多场景是 intentionally annoying and creeps you out 但是真的看起来如坐针毡太难受了，in a bad way. Sally Hawkins 一出场 I knew it! 加一星给小 K 的颜 and 颜 only.
这些电影为什么还会有人看啊？这导演为什么还能继续拍啊？就非得从这种帝王将相，才子佳人的屁股里扣出点东西来告诉我们，其实他们有时拉的也跟我们一样是吗？也就别扯什么“女性主义”了，太心酸了。你现在把摄影机扛到英国大街上去拍同名同姓的“戴安娜”都比这要好。以后这种电影不用看，一星直接甩上。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
