Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
让大家更了解当时的时局，和张伯伦的决定不易
捧年轻人效果不错，英国人讲绥靖……呃……故事没啥意思！
超好看。小说改编的。臭名昭著的慕尼黑协议。片尾一批洗白张伯伦的嫌疑。但是节奏真的很不错。二战本来就是一场非必要战争
的确牛，虽然剧情也就抗日神剧水平，但人家拍的水平高啊，离谱却很和谐。构图，节奏都很到位，配乐也不错，充满着印度味，但也兼顾了流行元素。
最后主角回归，跟主角拥抱的是那个英国女孩吗。
印度大爽片。整体看下来，我觉得倒更像是表现兄弟情的主旨，推翻入侵者统治只是复线任务。他想为部落带回小女孩，我抛弃大业帮你完成。你想为村庄带回枪支，我不顾性命帮你实现。
张麻子不发银子直接发枪，发枪之前要把民众内心的怒勾出来，还要哼唱一曲：枪在手，跟我走，杀四郎，抢碉楼。还以为我们的抗日剧抗得都不好意思了，阿三抗大英帝国那叫一个脸不红心不跳，燃就完了。顿时间原谅了《抗日奇侠》《松花江上的枪声》《神枪》《炮神》等一大票抗日大戏。双雄将荷尔蒙拉满，满满当当三个小时超燃倾情奉献，又打又跳又乐呵。影片通过夸大的效果实现了最低级最廉价的共情，还有意无意向历史人物原型献媚，做作恶心到没边。
剧情挺燃的 我就忽略那些Bug了
正巧跟今天的新闻有些贴合
“羊群有一个牧羊人，他会用生命保护羊群，那位牧羊人会走遍天涯海角带回失踪的小羊，就算发现小羊已落入虎口，他也会打断虎牙，掰开虎嘴，把小羊带回家。” 每个民族都应该有这样一个牧羊人。
很精致的片子，在真实历史的框架里展示不同人的各种抉择，很精彩
本片可谓是两兄弟为了拯救人民从陌生到一起的冰与火之歌。只有印度的歌舞才能给人独特的感染力，它能通过歌舞的形式继续推进剧情。而且歌舞很美很动人不是吗。
一个鲜血横流之时放声高歌，说：“老子宁折不弯”。
131分钟，豆瓣资料又瞎写！欧战前纵欲狂欢……以小见大的视角要避免混乱和乏味，本片凑合……美国大众还想关起门来过日子，上层蠢蠢欲动……元首所谓“纠纷终结”的意思是，不需要“谈”了！墨索里尼坑队友啊！办公室政治……这是政治人物？一切都往好处想？大英帝国真的没落了……国防军最鸡贼，有利益就上，见风险就躲！“希特勒再度让我们为当德国人而骄傲！”狂热是因为没有既得利益……希特勒选角不太像，借表这段有趣！小人物的努力太容易徒劳……种族主义者注定脑残！普通犹太人被双重抛弃……“我会想念你……”张伯伦被明捧实黑！动作戏有点搞笑……行刺者成不了事！噗，慕尼黑阴谋也被洗白“为盟军争取备战时间”，服！
一份有麻有辣有奶油有咸鱼有番茄酱有樱桃有小龙虾有臭豆腐的豪华大披萨！这片要是中国拍的票房绝对捧到100亿啊
说完永别却又见了最后一面，在战争面前一个个体要如何力挽狂澜。（换一个角度：Paul/Hugh，好嗑🤤🤤🤤）
从事后来解读希特勒和张伯伦有点马后炮的感觉，人们不能选择生活在哪个时代，只能对时代做出反应
离大谱的剧情精准对位印度观众的审美点，
英国人竟然胆敢找印度人斗舞这一无知举动就奠定了本片的超现实基调。阿兰和毕姆两人竟然还有史诗角色歌，秒回《摩诃婆罗多》，片尾舞蹈可以照搬上春晚。印度人想象力一直可以的。
三个小时居然看的意犹未尽。不用去琢磨合理不合理，无脑爽就完了。而且还能接受爱国主义教育，比我国主旋律电影不知高到哪里去了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
