A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
一度怀疑是新海诚新作😂，一直哼哼那八个音阶的旋律引起不适。
所有的其他一切都很好，就是故事真的太老套了。
噱头拉满却没一个立得住，荒木哲郎虚渊玄泽野弘之啥的根本不重要，片方估计一开始就没打算让他们发挥什么作用——毕竟这是一部只需要噱头的电影。看到不少人说画面绝美、剧情稀碎，我只赞同后半句，这画面好多地方好土啊（尤其是人物特写，把我看麻了，什么勾吧东西）。总之整部电影透着两个字：糊弄。唉，就这样，逗你玩！
只期与子偕老，
泡泡版人鱼公主公主最后幻化成了泡泡 却让样子记了一辈子
感谢陪伴了一个来小时的工作。背景的花画得挺好看的。别的实在是没啥可说的了。
全都是泡沫，只一刹的花火。。故事脱身于人鱼公主、辉夜姬之类的设定，呈现出来的还是新海诚化的唯美纯爱。剧本比较无聊，但霸权社的制作还是很酷炫的～泽野弘之的配乐加上丝滑流畅的跑酷动作分镜，赏心悦目～
故事内核居然是小美人鱼童话。可惜了这个世界观。
2022.05.11 一边缝我的背包目字扣，一边看完了这部，就画面挺美动作流畅，可是这泡泡到底怎么出现，来地球干啥没交代啊，还是我没看懂？
PS.有人说本片是日版《大鱼海棠》，笑死hhhh
东京跑酷少年版“海的女儿”。虽然这个泡泡的设定有点莫名其妙，结尾时还强行升华太尴尬，但是画面确实漂亮，还有音乐也很好听，尤其男女主在漂浮的物体上面训练跳跃以及比赛跑酷时，浪漫酷炫的场景配上背景音乐简直太美了。另外现在的电影是只要有比赛不论条件再苦再困难都不忘搞个直播嘛。虽然评分有点低，还是打个4星支持下。毕竟谁能拒绝这么一个可爱还有着蓝色头发的猫系少女呢。
海的女儿重构版 去爱吧 化成泡沫也在所不惜 「配乐绝了」
任何唯美的故事都要讲一个理由。多问自己为什么可以解释很多东西，在这里我真想打烂编剧的狗头，这他妈讲的是个什么东西！你的剧情和你的立意有他妈一毛钱关系！
整部动画优点和缺点都很明显。画面和音乐无疑都非常不错，但是人物形象的刻画和剧情的铺垫和收尾我认为都做得不是很好。
震惊！宇宙泡泡人姐妹欲攻陷地球，却因恋爱脑妹妹地下偷情致数年计划破产。网友：不忍直视！
（5/10）剧本各方面完成度很低很低，人物没动机，世界观几乎停留在基本为剧情服务的方面不能自圆其说，桥段设置意义不明，人物成长无法共情，主题揉成一团，以上等等不再多说了，因为没啥意义，本来就是当作画mad看的。不过作画还不错，确实贡献了几段很长的跑酷名场面，但是问题也有，就是太飘了，没有力量感，缺少第一人称，看不够啊，这倒是和这部影片一样，什么都跟泡泡一样，表面很华丽，但轻飘飘的一戳就破，破了以后啥也不剩。
挺烂的，也挺浪费了我的时间，没找出来优点哦。哦，一开头的那个泡泡，有颜色的，还挺好看的。
优缺点都很明显。本来正片出来之前就吸引人的点就是故事背景的高概念，但正片效果却差强人意，说是一堆槽点也不为过。人物塑造、故事逻辑和背景、感情线没有一个讲好的，倒是画面和配乐超出了及格线。其实也不能怪虚渊玄的剧本不行，因为这么多东西，往一个90多分钟的电影里面塞，能拍好的难度特别大。如果拍成十几集的动漫，这肯定是一个好故事或者说是一个合格的故事。
荒木哲郎+虚渊玄+泽野弘之+小畑健+wit studio，只能说buff越满越让人失望。
荒木+虚渊+小畑组团翻车；毫无危机感的轻松和平末世世界观+直接照搬照抄安徒生小美人鱼的突兀感情戏（全程只靠眉目传情和美型作画表现情感）+新海诚弟子一般的华而不实画面。作画和运镜的优秀也掩盖不了莫名其妙的剧情。从前期故事构思开始就注定挽救不了的类新海诚无聊作品。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
