A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
糖水铺的原型是文明路隔壁那间今日糖水，善良阿婆变成了动画的蒯老伯，常年劳作酸痛的手，隔壁帮忙的兰州拉面老板，亲近的街坊领居，时不时穿插老伯年轻是喜好甜品的缘由 并将贴着碗边吃凉的教给其他小朋友，因为忙碌少回家的子女，这些都是温馨的日常。这部片过于好睡。
有点drama 不过这就是意大利。男女颜值都好高，甜甜的学生恋爱，我也想拥有。
有励志催泪的《小火车》，
明亮：虽然7段故事没有情节方面的连结，却都在颂扬真善美，而又都能充满童趣，是一部有着明亮底色贯穿的专辑；
美食，家庭，中国人民的坚韧、友爱太治愈我了。记得带纸巾。
各种抓马大乱炖：我有两个父亲，我女朋友的哥哥喜欢我，我朋友嗑药，我的孕母和她前夫生下了我……救命🆘
出轨之人都是人渣，不可原谅。
特别喜欢这种不单单是只在讲爱情的电影 整体节奏荒诞又带点现实中的有趣 穿插的点有很多 出柜 出轨 爱与家庭 友情 同性婚姻 蛮不错的。
七个绘本小故事的动画电影，通俗易懂，质朴而温暖的情感路线，治愈了我们的心灵。
出轨之人都是人渣，不可原谅。
前奏进的很快，需要集中注意力！后面很多反转也是很吸引人，在医院那段真的很搞笑，每一位都表演的很棒，隔壁床的大爷都要看傻眼了哈哈这是什么庞大的家庭～是一个很独特的视角
出轨就是不行，和小三在一起？？？？？？抱歉！！！我的三观不允许我这么做！！！！
爱的千丝万缕！
小兔的身影在墙上照片的游走；镜头从蒯老伯的芝麻糊到城市运转、前者对后者的提喻；背景动画呈现了城市空间跟随行进的人在一张张原画下的飘逸，以及城市中到处充满着和翼娃子那样做作业的孩子……这些现实为基底的动画所呈现的一种共性是，动画做到了不只是将镜头聚焦于生活于此处现实的人，而且还呈现了现实中难以注意的人与世界的相互作用，这种无形的作用力在动画中被赋予形体，动画形式的突变让这些隐藏于现实世界的奇幻能被观众直观看见，最终这份默默的奇幻也被揭开了面纱，我们恍然大悟其名为“时间”。
3.5分。 之前看的同志电影，大部分都是在讲述感情、平权等问题，而本片则聚焦到同性婚姻合法化之后的同志家庭生活，走得很快。 但对于“出轨是两个人的问题”完全不赞成。 PS：drama简直刻在意大利人的骨子里。
爱无关乎血缘，是生活中的千丝万缕汇聚而成。
其实并不算儿童向。同场的孩子第三第四个故事就坐不住嚷着要走了，倒是我很多次被触动。森林里公交车司机大叔的幻想、蒯老伯的糖水铺、外婆的蓝色铁皮柜轮椅、黄焖鸡米饭小餐馆的故事都很打动我。很多次想起了《申奶奶的杂货铺》，那是一个多好的手工年代啊。
有回忆祖孙情的《外婆的蓝色铁皮柜轮椅》，
中国首部原创绘本电影，由7个小故事组成，有不同的主题，不仅适合小孩观看，也有供大人思考的寓意，我认为这才是送给孩子最好的礼物！
大风天的周六和朋友走了半小时摸到一个阴间电影院，几乎包场。咋说呢，很励志。对儿童、童书和绘本，我们都有太深太自以为是的误解了，而且沉溺得一厢情愿、无法自拔。路很长，好好干吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
